![]() |
2010-05-26
, 08:18
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#82
|
![]() |
2010-05-26
, 08:30
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#83
|
Carsten please correct me if I'm wrong, but scope of this discussion is to make the MeeGo-Harmattan stack work in the N900.
Running the MeeGo stack in the N900 is a goal covered already by the MeeGo project through the team coordinated by Harri.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-05-26
, 08:43
|
Posts: 999 |
Thanked: 1,117 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ earth?
|
#84
|
The Following User Says Thank You to johnel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-05-26
, 08:50
|
Posts: 168 |
Thanked: 265 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ London, UK
|
#85
|
![]() |
2010-05-26
, 09:04
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#86
|
It would be the first system implementing the MeeGo APIs and a MeeGo UX plus applications etc from Nokia's side. And what people would want to upgrade to. Either by buying a new device with Harmattan, or by running the community backport of Harmattan.
A proper 'MeeGo' (RPM based system) with Nokia differentiations, is yet to be seen - hence we can't want to backport it yetGive MeeGo (RPM based) time to mature. When it is, I bet it runs on N900 without big problems.
![]() |
2010-05-26
, 09:12
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#87
|
Am I right saying that the real question is what APIs/packages BESIDES the MeeGo ones are used by the UX and services in Harmattan ? For example if some bundled or system app/service uses the Ovi API or a particular gstreamer element, then we will have to make that API/lib available on the community port, too, regardless of it’s status in MeeGo for the N900.
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-05-26
, 09:20
|
Posts: 289 |
Thanked: 560 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ Tampere, Finland
|
#88
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jsa For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-05-26
, 09:44
|
|
Posts: 1,716 |
Thanked: 3,007 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#89
|
To make it perfectly clear. The Harmattan stack is an evolved Fremantle (as I understand it), that is, a Debian package based system, which is supposed to be MeeGo compliant, ie, it implements the same APIs applications would expect to find on a 'proper' MeeGo (rpm based) system.
![]() |
2010-05-26
, 10:24
|
Posts: 999 |
Thanked: 1,117 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ earth?
|
#90
|
@johnel
This thread is about bringing Harmattan to the N900. To put it bluntly, Harmattan is Maemo 6, not MeeGo. MeeGo compliant, maybe.
Now Harri and his team are working on MeeGo on N900. And I'd really expect MeeGo handheld UX to come with open applications needed for the essentials, making calls, sending messages, etc. What's the point if it doesn't? (check the MeeGo bugzilla for components you can file bugs against in the Handheld UX category)
These two projects may be partially intertwined (HW adaptation, parts of the UX maybe) but are not the same.
![]() |
Tags |
harmattan, meego |
Thread Tools | |
|
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc