biketool
|
2013-06-02
, 08:10
|
Posts: 1,427 |
Thanked: 2,626 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Touring
|
#81
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to biketool For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-06-02
, 08:15
|
Posts: 330 |
Thanked: 556 times |
Joined on Oct 2012
|
#82
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to malfunctioning For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-06-02
, 08:21
|
|
Posts: 1,986 |
Thanked: 7,698 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Dayton, Ohio
|
#83
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Copernicus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-06-02
, 08:25
|
|
Posts: 6,450 |
Thanked: 20,982 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#84
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-06-02
, 08:29
|
Posts: 330 |
Thanked: 556 times |
Joined on Oct 2012
|
#85
|
For the high power settings a ultra short pulsing will be brighter than 100% on duty cycle. As a white LED heats up its brightness drops and our eyes cant tell that it is a pulse over something like 30-60x a sec.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to malfunctioning For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-06-02
, 08:43
|
|
Posts: 1,986 |
Thanked: 7,698 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Dayton, Ohio
|
#86
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Copernicus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-06-02
, 08:49
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#87
|
The flash on the N900 must fire for a multiple of 54.6 ms plus one millisecond (go figure).
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to qwazix For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-06-02
, 08:55
|
|
Posts: 584 |
Thanked: 700 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#88
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fw190 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-06-02
, 09:02
|
Posts: 330 |
Thanked: 556 times |
Joined on Oct 2012
|
#89
|
Just a bit of theory. Flasing LEDs can take several times their nominal continuous current for a long time, even permanently, provided that two conditions are met.
1) The maximum pulse current is not exceeded;
2) The duty cycle is set such that the average current over a longer period of time does not exceed the maximum continuous current.
I don't know what the maximum pulse current for our LED is but it usually tends to be 10 to 20 times the maximum continuous current. If the chip allows 320 mA, then I would stick with it. The other bit is the duty cycle. At 1:1 duty cycle, you are right not to allow to stress the LED for too long. Setting it to 1:5 might allow you to breathe a bit more easily.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to malfunctioning For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-06-02
, 09:20
|
|
Posts: 6,450 |
Thanked: 20,982 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#90
|
If I'm understanding this correctly, running a 1:2 duty cycle (for example 50ms flash duration and 50ms strobe pause) at 320mA would be equivalent to an average current of 160mA (3.2 times the maximum continuous current). So probably not good to run that cycle for a long time, correct?
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
flashlight, lanterne, morse code, nokia n900, strobe light, torch |
Thread Tools | |
|