Vrette
|
2008-05-03
, 22:53
|
Posts: 28 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
|
#1
|
|
2008-05-03
, 23:38
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#2
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-05-04
, 02:55
|
Posts: 28 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
|
#3
|
|
2008-05-20
, 13:11
|
|
Posts: 357 |
Thanked: 115 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Sunny England :)
|
#4
|
|
2008-05-20
, 18:31
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#5
|
|
2008-05-21
, 08:19
|
|
Posts: 357 |
Thanked: 115 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Sunny England :)
|
#7
|
|
2008-05-22
, 10:43
|
Posts: 28 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Eastern U.S.A.
|
#8
|
because for a quick test telnet is much quicker than netcat, especially if I don't care about the output. For example, to test if a TCP port on a remote machine is accessible or not, "telnet 10.10.10.10 8009" is a quick and easy test.
Plus, I'm not a sys-admin, fluent in the ways of netcat, and I have to lookup how to use it again every time
|
2008-06-11
, 00:18
|
|
Posts: 226 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on May 2008
@ Texas/Earth/Sol System/Milky Way/Local Group/Hubble Bubble/Infinity
|
#9
|
|
2008-06-11
, 02:06
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#10
|
apt-get install telnet