Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 3 hrs, 2 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 15 hrs ago - more...
|
2009-10-31
, 03:37
|
|
Posts: 307 |
Thanked: 157 times |
Joined on Jul 2009
@ Illinois, USA
|
#2
|
Don't tell anyone that it was ME that told you, but I know for a fact that extra thickness is taken up by a flux capacitor.
Its an easter egg.
Its an easter egg.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mmurfin87 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-10-31
, 04:32
|
|
Posts: 49 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#3
|
Its too late now, but there should have been enough space for a larger battery. That would have been a killer feature.
|
|
2009-10-31
, 04:43
|
|
Posts: 521 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#4
|
Originally Posted by vzontini
Being this thick but not being able to fit the larger BP-4L 1500 mah battery but managing to fit space for a stylus... and with a UI design requires a stylus maybe 5-10% of the time.... bizarre design decision!
The cellphone news has been jumping on the new Motorola Droid Android 2.0 phone. At 60.0mm x 115.8mm x 13.7mm and 169g it packs a 3.7" WVGA capacitive screen and 1400mAh battery. The rest of the specs are comparable to the N900 as well.
The N900 is 59.8mm x 110.9mm × 18.0mm (19.55 at thickest) and 181g with a 3.5" WVGA screen and 1320mAh battery.
13.7mm thick vs 19.55 is a big difference.
At first I thought the slider design of the N900 was the reason for the extra thickness but that isn't the case.
This leaves me wondering why the N900 is so thick.
 |
|
2009-10-31
, 04:45
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#5
|
Originally Posted by bugelrex
Er, yeah, because you know for sure that the stylus made all the difference.
Being this thick but not being able to fit the larger BP-4L 1500 mah battery but managing to fit space for a stylus... and with a UI design requires a stylus maybe 5-10% of the time.... bizarre design decision!
__________________
Ryan Abel
Ryan Abel
|
|
2009-10-31
, 04:58
|
|
Posts: 521 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#6
|
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles
C'mon that stylus is pretty long.
Er, yeah, because you know for sure that the stylus made all the difference.
I'm pretty sure they didn't design the phone and found so much empty space that they said.. lets stick the stylus in there!
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bugelrex For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-10-31
, 04:58
|
|
Posts: 203 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#7
|
I was reading at Engadget that the keyboard is supposed to completely suck on the Droid (according to more than one person). And someone else noted that the camera is less than stellar. I don't really know how the engineering on these things works, but I wonder if Motorola skimped on a lot of components. So on paper the Droid looks pretty comparable to the N900. But in practice cramming so much in a super thin space resulted in cutting a lot of corners.
I do agree the stylus is a bit of an odd choice.
I've also read that the N900 was conceived more as a development device than a consumer device, but then Nokia made a different decision about what to do with it. So Perhaps Nokia wasn't making it's biggest effort to engineer for thinness.
Also I believe the case on the Droid is made of metal. Perhaps that allows the material to be a little thinner, at least accounting for 1mm?
I do agree the stylus is a bit of an odd choice.
I've also read that the N900 was conceived more as a development device than a consumer device, but then Nokia made a different decision about what to do with it. So Perhaps Nokia wasn't making it's biggest effort to engineer for thinness.
Also I believe the case on the Droid is made of metal. Perhaps that allows the material to be a little thinner, at least accounting for 1mm?
| The Following User Says Thank You to cb474 For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2009-10-31
, 05:27
|
|
Posts: 733 |
Thanked: 991 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#8
|
From what I have seen of the N900 mainboard, I think the thickness can be attributed to the stereo speakers and the camera module. Could be wrong.
|
|
2009-10-31
, 05:35
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#9
|
Originally Posted by bugelrex
Speaking as somebody who actually has access to a device, removing the stylus would not have provided enough room for the BP-4L.
C'mon that stylus is pretty long.
I'm pretty sure they didn't design the phone and found so much empty space that they said.. lets stick the stylus in there!
__________________
Ryan Abel
Ryan Abel
|
|
2009-10-31
, 05:41
|
|
Posts: 1,950 |
Thanked: 1,174 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Seattle, USA
|
#10
|
If you're going to need/prefer a stylus 10% of the time, then you need to have a place to stick it. And it needs to be convenient to get to and to put away. That means the phone needs a space for it. It adds a little bulk but nearly no weight. A good design decision, IMHO.
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to GeraldKo For This Useful Post: | ||
The N900 is 59.8mm x 110.9mm × 18.0mm (19.55 at thickest) and 181g with a 3.5" WVGA screen and 1320mAh battery.
13.7mm thick vs 19.55 is a big difference.
At first I thought the slider design of the N900 was the reason for the extra thickness but that isn't the case.
This leaves me wondering why the N900 is so thick.