|
2009-11-30
, 14:13
|
|
Posts: 2,669 |
Thanked: 2,555 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
@ Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
|
#2
|
|
2009-11-30
, 14:24
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#3
|
Nope, not to our knowledge. I've got no problems with reception even in low coverage/weak coverage areas. Where in Kentucky are you at? I used to live there and I know there are some very well known blackholes there.
|
2009-11-30
, 14:26
|
|
Posts: 909 |
Thanked: 216 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Bremen, Germany
|
#4
|
|
2009-11-30
, 14:27
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#5
|
|
2009-11-30
, 14:38
|
Posts: 486 |
Thanked: 154 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ New York City
|
#6
|
|
2009-11-30
, 14:40
|
|
Posts: 415 |
Thanked: 193 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
@ A place with no mountains
|
#8
|
|
2009-11-30
, 14:46
|
Posts: 220 |
Thanked: 129 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#9
|
I posted a very commending review on Thursday of all the N900's goodness:
1. Web & Flash experience is stunning
2. Video support
3. Good audio volume and quality from the 3.5 jack
4. The "E words" play great and equal or better than Droid (this was not in review- but worth pointing out).
5. Love having the precise input of a stylus as an option instead of just fingers.
6. Truly a netbook in the pocket
I then actually went out with the N900 as my "phone":
The N900 has the weakest 2G radio for a phone I have had and I have lived in the same area for over ten years for reference. I tested in weaker coverage areas, compared to my G1, Tmo Dash and N-gage. Places where I always would get one or two bars, will have no bars and when the N900 loses signal, it sometimes takes over one minute to get a signal back in an area with good coverage.
I do not mind that the N900 is not "phone-centric", but need to at least be able to make calls in weak coverage areas. I expected the N900 to at least have the same radio of the N-Gage, but did not expect it to be weaker than the G1 (weakest signal until got the N900).
Is there any way to adjust the signal like we can with wifi? This is going to be bad for me to get rid of the N900, considering the great features, but I do not want to have to carry two devices- The N900 and a phone with a decent signal.
Did they cut down on the 2G radio to conserve battery?
|
2009-11-30
, 14:48
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#10
|
1. Web & Flash experience is stunning
2. Video support
3. Good audio volume and quality from the 3.5 jack
4. The "E words" play great and equal or better than Droid (this was not in review- but worth pointing out).
5. Love having the precise input of a stylus as an option instead of just fingers.
6. Truly a netbook in the pocket
I then actually went out with the N900 as my "phone":
The N900 has the weakest 2G radio for a phone I have had and I have lived in the same area for over ten years for reference. I tested in weaker coverage areas, compared to my G1, Tmo Dash and N-gage. Places where I always would get one or two bars, will have no bars and when the N900 loses signal, it sometimes takes over one minute to get a signal back in an area with good coverage.
I do not mind that the N900 is not "phone-centric", but need to at least be able to make calls in weak coverage areas. I expected the N900 to at least have the same radio of the N-Gage, but did not expect it to be weaker than the G1 (weakest signal until got the N900).
Is there any way to adjust the signal like we can with wifi? This is going to be bad for me to get rid of the N900, considering the great features, but I do not want to have to carry two devices- The N900 and a phone with a decent signal.
Did they cut down on the 2G radio to conserve battery?
Last edited by Rushmore; 2009-11-30 at 14:27. Reason: spelling