Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 93 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#1
Hi
I have a video clip from my Flip video camera. It has the following format:

General / Container Stream # 1
Total Video Streams for this File -> 1
Total Audio Streams for this File -> 1
Video Codecs Used -> AVC
Audio Codecs Used -> AAC LC
File Format -> MPEG-4
Play Time -> 1mn 34s
Total File Size -> 117 MiB
Total Stream BitRate -> 10.4 Mbps

Video Stream # 1
Codec (Human Name) -> AVC
Codec (FourCC) -> avc1
Codec Profile -> Main@L4.0
Frame Width -> 1 280 pixels
Frame Height -> 720 pixels
Frame Rate -> 30.000 fps
Total Frames -> 2824
Display Aspect Ratio -> 16/9
Scan Type -> Progressive
Colorimetry -> 4:2:0
Codec Settings (Summary) -> CABAC / 1 Ref Frames
QF (like Gordian Knot) -> 0.375
Codec Settings (CABAC) -> Yes
Video Stream Length -> 1mn 34s 133ms
Video Stream BitRate -> 10.4 Mbps
Video Stream BitRate Mode -> VBR
Bit Depth -> 24 bits
Video Stream Size -> 116 MiB (99%)
Video Stream Language -> Japanese
Date of Original Encoding -> UTC 2009-11-18 21:39:04

Audio Stream # 1
Codec -> AAC
Codec (FourCC) -> 40
Audio Stream Length -> 1mn 34s 110ms
Audio Stream BitRate -> 64.0 Kbps
Audio Stream BitRate Mode -> CBR
Number of Audio Channels -> 1
Audio Channel's Positions -> C
Sampling Rate -> 44.1 KHz
Bit Depth -> 16 bits
Audio Stream Size -> 735 KiB (1%)
Audio Stream Language -> Japanese
Date of Original Encoding -> UTC 2009-11-18 21:39:04

mplayer in N900 would not play it. Is this a codec issue, or is it a video resolution/file size issue?

I have the Extra Decoders Support (ver 0.2-1) installed already.

Thanks!
 
Posts: 23 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Aug 2006
#2
The N900 does not play HD video, which is your 1280x720 file. Does do 800x480. AVC is not a problem.
 
Posts: 93 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#3
Thanks.

Reducing the number of pixels to 800 worked.

I was hoping that the n900 can take the HD video as is and shrink it down when displaying onto the screen.
 
Posts: 489 | Thanked: 404 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#4
Do you think that support for HD will come with time? Is it hardware or software related?
 
Posts: 236 | Thanked: 223 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ NE UK
#5
Originally Posted by torpedo48 View Post
Do you think that support for HD will come with time? Is it hardware or software related?
Seems unlikely. I guess it's too much to ask of the cpu/dsp to deal with the data rates you get with HD resolutions. Just as raw data, that's 900K pixels per frame, 25 frames a second, say 3 bytes per pixel. In total: a lot! The task of reducing the resolution only adds to the work needed.
 
Posts: 489 | Thanked: 404 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#6
Originally Posted by kwotski View Post
Seems unlikely. I guess it's too much to ask of the cpu/dsp to deal with the data rates you get with HD resolutions. Just as raw data, that's 900K pixels per frame, 25 frames a second, say 3 bytes per pixel. In total: a lot! The task of reducing the resolution only adds to the work needed.
I'm afraid you're right...
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:36.