|
2011-05-30
, 21:59
|
|
Posts: 464 |
Thanked: 338 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ UK, Northwest
|
#2
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dumpystig For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-31
, 09:07
|
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Italy
|
#3
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to foxOnTheRun For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-31
, 20:00
|
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Italy
|
#4
|
|
2011-05-31
, 20:02
|
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Italy
|
#5
|
I have the same style of unit but it has the micro usb connector - never tried it but I'm gona hook it up and see if the thing actually works. The ceramic cap value= 0.1uF
The Following User Says Thank You to foxOnTheRun For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-31
, 21:27
|
|
Posts: 464 |
Thanked: 338 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ UK, Northwest
|
#6
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to dumpystig For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-01
, 12:27
|
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Italy
|
#7
|
Yours mate - I've not opened mine (yet).
The capacitance value is often marked using a 3 digit code. This works in the same way as resistor coding but using numbers instead of colours. The first 2 numbers give the value and the last number is the multiplier. These give the value in Picofarads (pF), e.g. code 103 = 1 0 000pF (=0.01uF). Alternatively the value may be marked directly, for example 2n2 is 2.2 Nanofarads (nF).
|
2011-06-02
, 09:30
|
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Italy
|
#8
|
|
2011-06-02
, 12:48
|
Posts: 249 |
Thanked: 277 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Brighton, UK
|
#9
|
|
2011-06-02
, 16:33
|
Posts: 1,258 |
Thanked: 672 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#10
|
Tags |
battery, nokia n900 |
Thread Tools | |
|
I think they are all the same, the price was right, 1.99 Gbp (inc shipping), and it is the only thing which is right with this unit.
The quality is next to nothing:
The screw was already broken, both two wire fell off as I opened the unit, the plastic assembly feels (is) very cheap.
So, before letting it torture my batteries in a unspeakable way, I was wondering about it's regulation circuit.. so I opened it and took a couple of photos:
I know that "reverse engineering" is not good, in some places this leads to bad things.. but with this cheap object, I think I can still sleep thigh in the night, so I tryed to trace back it's circuit:
And produced this schema!
http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/8428/circuits.png
(I inserted the full link to the image of the circuit, handy).
Now.. Much work is still to be done, currently I have a terrible split-by-two headache, so I'm going to link the last file, is the archive with everything inside:
_ images
_ models
_ datasheets
_ circuit file (LTspice)
Link --> http://www.megaupload.com/?d=7EYM531E <--
The circuit actually is simuable, it tends to a voltage of 4.4 circa. I do not know if it is right (the simulation!), I measured with a multimeter the output (before wires broke up) and it was around 4.2 - must check later.
First thing to do is:
1. Verify traces and plotted circuit, the two images (PNGs - in the above archive) are overlappable, one of them is mirrored so it is easyer to check traces; can someone help me veryfing them? reports here all the suggestions, rights and wrongs.
Then:
2. Find reliable substitutes for the original transistors or reliable models.
3. Find correct component value I'm 90% they are correct, there are some normal 4 band resistors, a couple of 5 bands resistors and one ceramic cap which reads "104" -->180pF?
The very-very-very last step will be to... err.. improve the design
Now, I must really go to sleep, aber I'll pass out
I was inspired in making this post by a thread on replacements batteries BL-5J where battery capacity was verified - playing around this charger could be usefull to many people around here
See you later!
Last edited by foxOnTheRun; 2011-06-01 at 14:08. Reason: Typos