Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 395 | Thanked: 509 times | Joined on Jan 2011 @ Brisbane, Australia
#61
Last time I checked, the PC versions of the console games (those ported from PC to console, anyway) have always been better in near every way, than the console version.

Even some of the console ports to PC.
But still, I would like to see you playing Battlefield 3 on a tablet, not only would it be stupid- but it would be stupid.
 
Daneel's Avatar
Posts: 549 | Thanked: 698 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#62
Why not? I just need to plug keyboard, mouse and monitor in my tablet, easy peasy.
 
Posts: 908 | Thanked: 501 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ West Sussex, England
#63
Originally Posted by Daneel View Post
You might want to open your windows and smell the silicone. Most of the big players have. Thats why all the big fuss with the cloud is about, thats why Google are trying to push Chrome OS, thats why Microsoft "bought" Nokia, thats why everyone is churning out tablets like mad, trying to catch the last train out of desktopville.

Tablet/Mobile is going to replace the Desktop.
The only remnants from the Desktop era might some of the perhiperals: Monitors, Mice, Keyboards etc.
You will dishout your quadcore/hdmi/usb pocketable device, connect it to the said perhiperals and voila, instant Desktop.
Oh yes, it's such a fast train out of desktopville that only the iPad is making profit and everyone i know thinks tablets are pointless. Such a fast train that only Android and iOS have tablets, while the "big players" you mention like Dell and Acer as yet don't have them, and do you really think people are going to ditch OS X, Linux or Windows for an Android tablet? No, of course not. None of the tablets even do multitasking like a computer does yet. Your suggestion is the same as the Mini Mac, a small portable computer that can be plugged into a monitor, which was hardly a runaway success. With the way phones are going, people will just use phones in the way you're suggesting. You're off your head if you think they'll replace real computers though, no chance. Quad core blah blah blah, what about 1TB storage and 8GB RAM and a DVD player/rewriter? which is what a lot of computers come with now.

Google are always pushing something, not all of their innovations get embraced by the public, so why mention Chrome OS? The Cloud has pros and cons, i use skydrive as i mentioned, but i wouldn't rely solely on it, ever. You seem to be one of those baffling people who thinks that when something new and popular comes along it will eradicate older technology. It's only now that some people are replacing their landlines with mobiles for crying out loud
 
PMaff's Avatar
Posts: 361 | Thanked: 219 times | Joined on Sep 2010
#64
Originally Posted by bandora View Post
...
I was arounf at that time hehe and I know all about it, but I didn't say anything about that, all I said was that their software isn't as bad as how people make it seem like on the internet, that's all.
...
It IS as bad.
At least in my experience.
And I have to use that crap from time to time for over 20 years now.
:-/
Well...you can use that Win OSes for games, but that's it.


Originally Posted by bandora View Post
And yes, I said it would be a plus for WP7 owners (they'll have free OVI Maps and integrated Skype).. But I'm like you, I don't see myself using WP7 (at least not anytime soon)..
What does it tell us, if somebody, who thinks that Win-SW is not as bad as told, also does not use WP7? :-)
 
Posts: 908 | Thanked: 501 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ West Sussex, England
#65
Originally Posted by PMaff View Post
What does it tell us, if somebody, who thinks that Win-SW is not as bad as told, also does not use WP7? :-)
Absolutely nothing, because that's not why people buy something - easily proven by the fact that Windows is the largest OS. People buy phones for the ease of use and features it packs. I can understand with no problem why people won't yet buy WP7, it's only a few months old and is lacking certain features
 
PMaff's Avatar
Posts: 361 | Thanked: 219 times | Joined on Sep 2010
#66
Originally Posted by richwhite View Post
...
they moved away because they want a fresh OS, which wp7 is.
Have the Windows fanboys dropped into this forum? :-)

WP7 is as fresh as a 80year old woman. :-)
I just say "missing copy paste".


Originally Posted by richwhite View Post
Unlike apple, they won't need to lie about inventing stuff, just show those incredible 3d maps, the social integration that is so beyond anything else, the gyro features of mango, maemo-esque multitasking and the live tiles and this can easily be a winner.
Social Integration was in Maemo quite some time before WP7.
Multitasking does only have the name but it is not multitasking as you can read here:
"It appears fast task switching does not mean multi-tasking, but rather rapid suspend and restore, and that real multi-tasking will be exclusive to certain tasks such as the background music task, much like on the iPhone."
http://wmpoweruser.com/wp7-multi-tas...from-mwc-2011/

And here about Mango:
http://nexus404.com/Blog/2011/03/07/...-for-wp7-fans/
 
Posts: 908 | Thanked: 501 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ West Sussex, England
#67
Originally Posted by PMaff View Post
Have the Windows fanboys dropped into this forum? :-)

WP7 is as fresh as a 80year old woman. :-)
I just say "missing copy paste".




Social Integration was in Maemo quite some time before WP7.
Multitasking does only have the name but it is not multitasking as you can read here:
"It appears fast task switching does not mean multi-tasking, but rather rapid suspend and restore, and that real multi-tasking will be exclusive to certain tasks such as the background music task, much like on the iPhone."
http://wmpoweruser.com/wp7-multi-tas...from-mwc-2011/

And here about Mango:
http://nexus404.com/Blog/2011/03/07/...-for-wp7-fans/
No i'm not a MS fanboy, not a fan of the company at all. I've already stated what pulled me to WP7 was the office/skydrive integration because of my job.

WP7 is fresh, no denying it, and it does have copy/paste. I've owned the N900 for 15 months, have used Symbian for years, S^3 for a few months, iPhone and Android, and none of them have social integration like WP7, none at all. Maemo has IM integration, and exceptionally so, but i'm talking about facebook and other social media sites.

WP7 isn't maemo by any stretch, and yes it does some things i don't like and plenty of things i do like - ditto for every phone i've ever owned including the N900.

The last link is 2 months old, think the delays have been restored. Still, you're a nokia user complaining another company delays updates?
 
PMaff's Avatar
Posts: 361 | Thanked: 219 times | Joined on Sep 2010
#68
Originally Posted by azkay View Post
I wonder if the people who type "Micro$oft" know how childish they look.
It's all about money, not about invention. ;-)

Originally Posted by azkay View Post
I also find it funny how people blame Microsoft for everything wrong with their windows installs.
If it only were my own installs I would say: ok, my fault.
But I've seen BSODs on machines where I did not install.


Originally Posted by azkay View Post
The large majority of the time, it isnt Microsofts fault. Its the third party that made the drivers that are erroring, its the third party that made the programs that didnt do it right.
Well, on my Linux desktop the drivers are also made by
3rd parties. Software too.
Still the Linux OS does not get Kernel Panics all the time if the
3rd party stuff crashes.
E.g. defect network card: Windows 7 bsods.
Linux gave some error messages in /var/log/messages and you
have no network but it does not crash.


Originally Posted by azkay View Post
...
Its not the OS, its the user &/ third party developer.
I disagree very much.
The OS should not be bothered if the 3rd party software or
hardware fails.
WinOS do.
Too often.
 
Posts: 362 | Thanked: 143 times | Joined on Mar 2008
#69
@ richwhite: MS is trying to 'buy' their way into the mobile space(and eventually mobile computing). It is good for them, it is their money. Whether it will work due to tech merit or by "BS", that will be difficult to say. Personally, I don't see them winning on Tech merit with their WP7.

WP7 is a 'few' months old, but MS has been doing this(as in pushing into the mobile space) for years and it should have been well polished after all these years.
 
Posts: 908 | Thanked: 501 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ West Sussex, England
#70
Originally Posted by cheve View Post
@ richwhite: MS is trying to 'buy' their way into the mobile space(and eventually mobile computing). It is good for them, it is their money. Whether it will work due to tech merit or by "BS", that will be difficult to say. Personally, I don't see them winning on Tech merit with their WP7.

WP7 is a 'few' months old, but MS has been doing this(as in pushing into the mobile space) for years and it should have been well polished after all these years.
I agree that WP7 shouldn't be lacking the features it is, i'm hoping that Nokia will correct this though considering that it doesn't skimp on its own features.

You're absolutely right MS is trying to buy its way in, it has always bullied its way to the top - but what's the competition anyway? Apple takes existing stuff, claims it as its own and then sells, the iPhone isn't popular on tech merit but image and advertising. Google is flooding the market making it hard not to buy an Android - I went to Best Buy the other day and of 15 phones, 13 were Android and 1 was iPhone and 1 WP7.

I don't really agree with MS monopolising the tech industry, but specifically from a consumer standpoint I can see the attraction of the ecosystem - having Skype work on XBox? Very nice. There is plenty of tech merit going for WP7, and having used all 3, i would take it over Android or iOS any day of the week - and that's just with the first update.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:47.