|
2011-05-03
, 14:18
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#42
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but what really keeps MeeGo from being installed, say, in an Android device with unlocked bootloader (assuming it runs on ARM) is the lack of drivers for that specific device, correct?
The Following User Says Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-11
, 21:41
|
Posts: 73 |
Thanked: 66 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#43
|
|
2011-05-11
, 21:57
|
Posts: 3,464 |
Thanked: 5,107 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gothenburg in Sweden
|
#44
|
Meego has never been the future. The future is Maemo, the sooner Nokia realise that, the sooner they will have a great platform on the side of Symbian and WinMobile.
|
2011-05-12
, 00:50
|
Posts: 619 |
Thanked: 691 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#45
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Frappacino For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-12
, 00:52
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#46
|
|
2011-05-12
, 09:30
|
Posts: 73 |
Thanked: 66 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#47
|
This statement screams "I don't understand what Maemo or MeeGo are, nor how operating systems work on a basic level."
|
2011-05-12
, 09:56
|
Posts: 73 |
Thanked: 66 times |
Joined on May 2011
|
#48
|
Whats wrong with Meego? If youre talking about the Meego reference UI your right but thats a different story.
Not many devs want to tweek with some C API today and Qt(Quick) is far better development framework for handset and Desktop apps. Thee tweeked C API in Maemo5 is really a mess.
Many devs has already started to use QtQuick instead so I dont see why we should not keep going with Meego.
|
2011-05-12
, 10:09
|
|
Posts: 549 |
Thanked: 698 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#49
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Daneel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-13
, 21:58
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#50
|
Tags |
maemo lives, n900 dead, purge-abill |
|
N9: Go white or go home