Active Topics
-
Maemo repository (5)
to Community by dredlok706 - 1 day, 6 hrs ago -
Re-commissioning N9 in 2018 (127)
to MeeGo / Harmattan by smatkovi - 1 day, 8 hrs ago -
Porting apps to Leste (41)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Arno_11 - 2 days, 2 hrs ago -
List of well performing apps on Leste (33)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 2 days, 10 hrs ago -
N900 is not recognizable on any of my devices (windows 10,7, xp) What can I do? (1)
to Nokia N900 by nieldk - 3 days, 14 hrs ago -
Error after installing Leste on sdcard (13)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Maemish - 6 days, 17 hrs ago - more...
|
2011-04-15
, 11:11
|
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Apr 2011
|
#22
|
anyone interested in an updated list of most of the world phones us sar levels and a chart that compares them it can be seen
at http://cellphones-radiation-ratings.com
at http://cellphones-radiation-ratings.com
|
|
2011-05-31
, 18:43
|
|
Posts: 67 |
Thanked: 19 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Nu1st Street, Iron Triange, Richmond, CA
|
#23
|
The evidence is mounting up, mobile phones have some cancer correlation.
__________________
marty collins, esq
all-access law
@martselectsoul
@martycollinsesq
marty collins, esq
all-access law
@martselectsoul
@martycollinsesq
| The Following User Says Thank You to martycollinsesq For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2011-05-31
, 18:59
|
|
Posts: 889 |
Thanked: 2,087 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Manchester
|
#24
|
I take it you're referring to this:
http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/p...fs/pr208_E.pdf
Lyon, France, May 31, 2011 ‐‐ The WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has
classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B),
based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer 1 , associated with
wireless phone use.
 |
|
2011-06-01
, 02:22
|
|
Posts: 752 |
Thanked: 284 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Malaysia
|
#25
|
I think (for this thread), we need to seperate SAR to 2 issues:
1) SAR level and the impact
2) Exposure to potentially dangerous element
I noticed a lot of comments that the SAR levels on mobilephones are insignificant to fry any brain matter. And you can compare it with the worst phones to feel good. We should also be concerned with just being exposed to this "radiofrequency electromagnetic fields", and on a prolonged period. Remember, our phones are with us almost 24/7. Our microwaves and TVs are at home when we are driving, working, shopping, etc.
I still think some caution is still required. Can we really trust the publications saying how safe it is? Even FDA says milk/dairy products are good for you when some external agencies think otherwise???
1) SAR level and the impact
2) Exposure to potentially dangerous element
I noticed a lot of comments that the SAR levels on mobilephones are insignificant to fry any brain matter. And you can compare it with the worst phones to feel good. We should also be concerned with just being exposed to this "radiofrequency electromagnetic fields", and on a prolonged period. Remember, our phones are with us almost 24/7. Our microwaves and TVs are at home when we are driving, working, shopping, etc.
I still think some caution is still required. Can we really trust the publications saying how safe it is? Even FDA says milk/dairy products are good for you when some external agencies think otherwise???
|
|
2011-06-01
, 04:01
|
|
Posts: 752 |
Thanked: 284 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Malaysia
|
#26
|
Just saw this on the news:
Last year, results of a large study found no clear link between cellphones and cancer. But some advocacy groups contend the study raised serious concerns because it showed a hint of a possible connection between very heavy phone use and glioma, a rare but often deadly form of brain tumour. However, the numbers in that subgroup weren't sufficient to make the case.
http://techcentral.my/news/story.asp...19&sec=it_news
Maybe in future, handphones will be restricted/banned like they do for cigarattes???
Last year, results of a large study found no clear link between cellphones and cancer. But some advocacy groups contend the study raised serious concerns because it showed a hint of a possible connection between very heavy phone use and glioma, a rare but often deadly form of brain tumour. However, the numbers in that subgroup weren't sufficient to make the case.
http://techcentral.my/news/story.asp...19&sec=it_news
Maybe in future, handphones will be restricted/banned like they do for cigarattes???
 |
|
2011-06-01
, 05:20
|
|
Posts: 434 |
Thanked: 990 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Australia
|
#27
|
worth doing some research into WHO guidelines for determining status as a carcinogen.......
see how many people need to get/die from cancer (with the excluson of all other risk factors) before they rate something as carcinogenic
see how many people need to get/die from cancer (with the excluson of all other risk factors) before they rate something as carcinogenic
__________________
Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
Point taken, I wasn't correct enough for this. I edited my post to clarify.
Thanks for pointing out the mistake!
You should follow me on Twitter!
Apps: Puzzle Master, IRC Chatter for Harmattan, IRC for Sailfish