|
2011-06-06
, 16:47
|
Posts: 139 |
Thanked: 224 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ San Francisco, CA
|
#152
|
To charge $600 on a slow Symbian E7 was ludicrous before the announcement of Symbian's death and was already a spoiler.
|
2011-06-06
, 17:56
|
Banned |
Posts: 974 |
Thanked: 622 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#153
|
Looks like you can get the E7 now for $350 (after going through a few hoops) from Nokia US. Isn't this their current flag ship?
http://slickdeals.net/forums/showthr...id=0&t=2995111
|
2011-06-06
, 19:13
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#154
|
Android keeps climbing without gasping for breath.
http://androidandme.com/2011/06/news...-life-support/
BB/WP7/WebOS? Not so much...
|
2011-06-06
, 19:30
|
Posts: 108 |
Thanked: 120 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#155
|
|
2011-06-06
, 19:32
|
Posts: 139 |
Thanked: 224 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ San Francisco, CA
|
#156
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cBeam For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-06
, 19:56
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#157
|
define "Apple has in some ways taken over at the top" please?
Taken over what? they have done nothing more than prove that you can copy other manufacturers technology (from years ago) and convince people, through clever marketing, that it's "new".
the only thing apple has managed to do (and wit great success) is make a feature phone extremely usable, and thus, make people believe that it's "smart".
the assumption that because someone is a leader in the desktop market, they will by default be a leader in the mobile market , is a fallacy.
People lke to think that Apple is leader in the mobile world, even Elop does, but, while their prodicts in the desktop market are great, they don't have a massive market share.
And just because microsoft has market share in the Desktop world, means in no way that they will, by default, make in the mobile arena. They've been trying, and failing for 15 years.
The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-06
, 19:58
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#158
|
Hehehehe in the tags I'm mentioned:
"mojo = tl;dr"
It feels good to recognized.
|
2011-06-06
, 20:00
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#159
|
define "Apple has in some ways taken over at the top" please?
Taken over what? they have done nothing more than prove that you can copy other manufacturers technology (from years ago) and convince people, through clever marketing, that it's "new".
the only thing apple has managed to do (and wit great success) is make a feature phone extremely usable, and thus, make people believe that it's "smart".
the assumption that because someone is a leader in the desktop market, they will by default be a leader in the mobile market , is a fallacy.
People lke to think that Apple is leader in the mobile world, even Elop does, but, while their prodicts in the desktop market are great, they don't have a massive market share.
And just because microsoft has market share in the Desktop world, means in no way that they will, by default, make in the mobile arena. They've been trying, and failing for 15 years.
|
2011-06-06
, 21:03
|
|
Posts: 889 |
Thanked: 2,087 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Manchester
|
#160
|
Except that I don't see what the long-term benefits of killing your own ecosystem and building up Microsoft's ecosystem. That is, unless you want to be HTC.
Combine this with the slow develoment of MeeGo, you wonder if there will be any customers left once it is ready for prime time.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mrsellout For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
bada blows, buysomethinelse, good move, goodbye nokia, wp7 rocks |
|
While they might not have had enough ressources to support 3 operating systems, they could have supported Qt on all platforms they use. They could have made Qt run on Android (somebody already ported it somehow) or insist on porting it to WP7 when talking to Microsoft about WP7 adoption.
To have their (Elop's) desired position in which they stand out form the other phone makers through a non mass-market OS. (Even ZTE will sell WP7 - that makes Elop's main argument against Android just wrong).
With all the knowledge they had acquired with Trolltech (relatively small company that managed to support Qt on Windows, Linux and OSX) they could easily have made Qt support for MeeGo, Symbian, Android and WP7 possible additionally.
That would mean, code one program and have at least it's interface run everywhere important (except iOS of course).
They could have had their Ovi/Nokia Services on almost every computer and smartphone, also sell software then, and make the transition to a software company.
Anyway... I don't actually care as much for Nokia now as I care for Qt. So sad.