|
2011-06-14
, 21:30
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#32
|
My error, I was typing when I got interrupted... You've seen the result, but please don't fix it for me (ya)
The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-14
, 22:42
|
|
Posts: 337 |
Thanked: 283 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ NYC
|
#33
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sopwith For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-14
, 22:46
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#34
|
|
2011-06-14
, 23:25
|
Banned |
Posts: 974 |
Thanked: 622 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#35
|
Is this to be the future of mobile technology? Is it to be that history repeats itself? Redudant redundancies? Well, at least this time around Microsoft doesn't have all the cards stacked against everyone else like they did during the PC desktop/laptop era. This is finally turning into the kind of evolution we SHOULD have had, instead of the sad, depressing, crying shame we ended up with during the Windows/Intel era. Perhaps it's not history repeating itself, then, so much as a history do-over?
|
2011-06-15
, 05:48
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#36
|
It is not Microsoft fault that no one was/is able to make anything better. Besides, I have had smartphones for ages already, and right now I cannot find a worthy replacement for my aging N900 even though the shops have zillions of different smartphones. I guess good old Microsoft/Nokia will come to rescue eventually, at least I hope so.
The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-15
, 05:59
|
|
Posts: 323 |
Thanked: 189 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Brazil
|
#37
|
It is not Microsoft fault that no one was/is able to make anything better. (...)
|
2011-06-15
, 07:34
|
Banned |
Posts: 974 |
Thanked: 622 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#38
|
Would you mind to tell me what do you know/remember about cases like ICQ vs MSN or Netscape vs Internet Explorer?
|
2011-06-15
, 08:53
|
Posts: 341 |
Thanked: 607 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#39
|
I believe that nobody mastered coercion and software racketeering quite like Microsoft, alright! I think most people would agree that it certainly wasn't because the SOFTWARE was better. As I recall, everybody has had ample opportunity to meet General Protection Fault at one point or another in their lives. Sometimes many times in the same day.
Myesss. I'm sure Nokia will work FAMOUSLY with Microsoft. Famously. :P heheh
The Following User Says Thank You to kanishou For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-06-15
, 23:57
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#40
|
Microsoft was there at the right time, with the right piece of software. It was good enough and put Microsoft into a good position, which they occasionally have abused (or at least gone to the limits of what can be considered ethical).
However, the Microsoft of today has excellent software teams and is also making an effort to avoid PR disasters like those which happened before. They are a company like everyone else, they make mistakes, they learn, they change.
The anti-Microsoft stance expressed by some may be understandable to some extend, but often borders on the childish.
If there is a "big bully" in today's market, then it's Apple. And Google is to the mobile market what Microsoft was to the PC market: Cheap, good enough, and spreading incredibly fast. We cannot allow a single operating system to become as pervasive as Windows was on the PC, and that is why Windows Phone 7 is not the bad guy in this race. Yes Android may technically be Open Source, but we know very well that it is still tightly controlled by Google.
Competition is good and healthy, even if it is proprietary and comes from Microsoft.
Tags |
futurama, speculation |
|
Bugger