Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Stskeeps's Avatar
Posts: 1,671 | Thanked: 11,478 times | Joined on Jun 2008 @ Warsaw, Poland
#31
Originally Posted by momcilo View Post
As for Meego, this was supposed to be included in Meego 1.2, but apparently it was dropped. I suspect this may be the main reason Nokia has decided to push Harmattan forward instead.
Nah, you got your timelines mixed up. MeeGo 1.2 release came after Feb11.

Anyway.

For freedom lovers, if:
* SIM lock isn't active
* Security lock isn't active (you know, pincode, protecting data)
* Developer mode is active (i'm a little unsure if this is even required)

You can flash your own kernel and rootfs without aegis. We have MeeGo CE running with phonecalls, etc.
__________________
As you go on to other communities, remember to build them around politeness, respect, trust and humility. Be wary of poisonous people and deal with them before they end up killing your community.. Seen it happen to too many IRC channels, forums, open source projects.
 

The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post:
Posts: 196 | Thanked: 224 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Africa
#32
Originally Posted by momcilo View Post
This is controlled through contract.
In *some* countries.

You are still obliged to pay.
In *some* countries.

Locking a phone to a particular SIM is a form of monopoly.
That only exists in *some* countries.

BTW: they don't need to lock up the phone itself for SIM enforcement. It is enough to use the GSM module for that purpose.
So no modern phones subsidised by contracts are able to make phone calls (which is where the operator is hoping to recover their subsidy) via any means but GSM?

I don't believe somebody else should decide what is run/played on my device.
Then buy your device from someone who allows you that freedom.


I don't want a mainstream device.
Then stay with your N900 or Neo.

I would accept a device which *can*, but doesn't always need to, enforce "platform security", in order to be competitive in certain restrictive markets which have a huge influence on device adoption, *if* I have the choice to disable the platform security.

Again, this is not a technical issue. If you don't like the fact that your operator only provides sim-locked devices (note, this is check done before checking if open mode is allowed, so no unlocked phone can be prevented from being used in open mode), then I fail to see why you use this operator.

If your country allows all operators to sim-lock all phones forever, well, I think you have bigger problems ...
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to buchanmilne For This Useful Post:
Posts: 196 | Thanked: 224 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Africa
#33
Originally Posted by momcilo View Post
The most obvious implication of the diagram from the presentation I've posted is that it is not possible to effectivly use kernel that is not signed by nokia.
if your phone is sim-locked and your operator has prevented open-mode. If you have a non-sim-locked phone, or if your operator allows open mode, you can use an unsigned kernel.

Even the bootloader is verified.
The bootloader is always verified, and device reset if it does not verify, regardless of simlocking etc. or not. This may be a more serious problem than the kernel verification (which can fail if unlocked or open mode is allowed).
 
Posts: 673 | Thanked: 856 times | Joined on Mar 2006
#34
Originally Posted by Stskeeps View Post
Nah, you got your timelines mixed up. MeeGo 1.2 release came after Feb11.

Anyway.

For freedom lovers, if:
* SIM lock isn't active
* Security lock isn't active (you know, pincode, protecting data)
* Developer mode is active (i'm a little unsure if this is even required)

You can flash your own kernel and rootfs without aegis. We have MeeGo CE running with phonecalls, etc.
Thanks for clearing that part: custom kernels can run under "Open Mode".

Do you know if the Service Providers will be able to disable Open Mode (Development Mode)? Diagram suggests that as possibility, and that is important for people obtaining N9s through contract.
 
Stskeeps's Avatar
Posts: 1,671 | Thanked: 11,478 times | Joined on Jun 2008 @ Warsaw, Poland
#35
Originally Posted by momcilo View Post
Thanks for clearing that part: custom kernels can run under "Open Mode".

Do you know if the Service Providers will be able to disable Open Mode (Development Mode)? Diagram suggests that as possibility, and that is important for people obtaining N9s through contract.
If you obtain a device through contract, the terms and conditions of it's usage is through that contract. Usually they'll do this through SIM lock.

If you want full freedom, pay for the whole thing at once. It's often cheaper to get a temporary loan with the bank anyway and/or set aside money.
__________________
As you go on to other communities, remember to build them around politeness, respect, trust and humility. Be wary of poisonous people and deal with them before they end up killing your community.. Seen it happen to too many IRC channels, forums, open source projects.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post:
Posts: 196 | Thanked: 224 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Africa
#36
Originally Posted by momcilo View Post
I don't believe somebody else should decide what is run/played on my device.
If it is a subsidised phone, with the subsidy given on the basis of additional revenue that the operator will derive from your (restricted) use of the device (e.g. billable communication, licensed media etc.), then it is not your device.

If you have a device which is not subsidised in any way (but your plan covers the full cost of the device), then the operator should be obliged to allow you to unlock your device.

if the operator is *not* obliged to unlock *your* device, once again, the technical implementation is not your problem, your problem is that your government supports big companies dictating how you use communication devices. The solution to this is not technical (as the companies will simply use other means to prevent you using a device that doesn't have the technical means to support their business model). Unfortunately, technical solutions that allow them to do this already exist, and you can't change that.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to buchanmilne For This Useful Post:
Posts: 673 | Thanked: 856 times | Joined on Mar 2006
#37
Originally Posted by buchanmilne View Post
So no modern phones subsidised by contracts are able to make phone calls (which is where the operator is hoping to recover their subsidy) via any means but GSM?
In short yes, anything other is quite invasive.

Originally Posted by buchanmilne View Post
Then buy your device from someone who allows you that freedom.
From whom? As a "consumer" we have to state the features we are interested in. Hopefully someone will address those needs.

Originally Posted by buchanmilne View Post
Then stay with your N900 or Neo.
My Neo works fine thank you.
Hopefully GTA04 boards will be available.

Originally Posted by buchanmilne View Post
I would accept a device which *can*, but doesn't always need to, enforce "platform security", in order to be competitive in certain restrictive markets which have a huge influence on device adoption, *if* I have the choice to disable the platform security.

Again, this is not a technical issue. If you don't like the fact that your operator only provides sim-locked devices (note, this is check done before checking if open mode is allowed, so no unlocked phone can be prevented from being used in open mode), then I fail to see why you use this operator.
I am not talking about the choice of informed buyer. I am talking about the majority of posters at N9 thread, who will buy the device without checking if it can be run in Open Mode.

Originally Posted by buchanmilne View Post
If your country allows all operators to sim-lock all phones forever, well, I think you have bigger problems ...
In short yes.

Last edited by momcilo; 2011-09-15 at 09:59.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to momcilo For This Useful Post:
Posts: 673 | Thanked: 856 times | Joined on Mar 2006
#38
Originally Posted by Stskeeps View Post
If you obtain a device through contract, the terms and conditions of it's usage is through that contract. Usually they'll do this through SIM lock.

If you want full freedom, pay for the whole thing at once. It's often cheaper to get a temporary loan with the bank anyway and/or set aside money.
Is there any quick way of checking if Open Mode is disabled on device while running Harmattan?

Last edited by momcilo; 2011-09-15 at 09:59.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to momcilo For This Useful Post:
Stskeeps's Avatar
Posts: 1,671 | Thanked: 11,478 times | Joined on Jun 2008 @ Warsaw, Poland
#39
Originally Posted by momcilo View Post
Is there any quick way of checking if Open Mode is disabled on device while running Harmattan?
No clue, sorry. SIM lock is more likely to be it though.
__________________
As you go on to other communities, remember to build them around politeness, respect, trust and humility. Be wary of poisonous people and deal with them before they end up killing your community.. Seen it happen to too many IRC channels, forums, open source projects.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post:
baptx's Avatar
Posts: 48 | Thanked: 80 times | Joined on Aug 2011 @ France
#40
We know Harmattan is a MeeGo by Nokia, so maybe less open and hackable but this won't change anything for me, I'll use the N9 because there's no better device actually. What about the N900 platform security, how does it works?
 
Reply

Tags
locked boot, neutered, trecherous


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:39.