![]() |
2006-03-13
, 09:30
|
Posts: 191 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
|
#2
|
![]() |
2006-03-13
, 11:17
|
Posts: 50 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Lyon, France
|
#3
|
if you look at the screenshots you'll see that they're using l2tp, which is also a standard a'la pptp and ipsec.
![]() |
2006-03-13
, 12:38
|
Posts: 191 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
|
#4
|
Mika Bostrom
<bostik@stinghorn.com> to maemo-developers
Stinghorn is pleased to announce the availability of our
L2TP/IPsec VPN client for Nokia 770.
* Clean GUI
* Although requires a custom kernel image, still simple
to install
* Sources readily available for all parties
* Works like a charm
You can check out our opensource site at
http://opensource.stinghorn.com/stinghorn-trac/wiki and
get the sources from our Subversion repository at
http://opensource.stinghorn.com/svn/
Instructions for building your own client and kernel
are also available, in case you feel unsure about using a
third-party provided (that would be us) one.
Personal credits: for writing the client, Tomi Ollila,
who has been actually pestering you on this very list about
packaging and menu issues. My involvement was limited to just
getting the components for L2TP/IPsec connection built and
working.
Why build a client like this? We offer a commercial
L2TP/IPsec VPN gateway which works seamlessly with several
platforms - with now Nokia 770 included.
On behalf of entire Stinghorn team, enjoy.
--
Mika Boström \-/ "World peace will be achieved
Bostik@stinghorn.com X when the last man has killed
+358 40 759 0016 /-\ the second-to-last." -anon?
![]() |
2006-03-13
, 13:02
|
Posts: 41 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
@ Brasil
|
#5
|
![]() |
2006-03-13
, 13:48
|
Posts: 191 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
|
#6
|
![]() |
2006-03-13
, 15:01
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#7
|
Custom kernel image? that smells bad. Can't the necessary stuff be built as modules?
![]() |
2007-10-22
, 12:40
|
Posts: 3 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#8
|
But why do they create a specific VPN solution ? There are standards around here : IPSEC and SSL ! Does the only standard they know about is a proprietary solution ?
Why do they to reinvent the wheel ?
Moreover their solution doesn't seem to use x509 certificates which would lead to management difficulties.
For now, waiting for a port of OpenS/Wan, I'm using openvpn with certificates. A little slow to start by functional. Good job.
openvpn is a defacto (and open) standard in the Linux world not a true standard however.
db