![]() |
2011-11-09
, 07:13
|
Posts: 49 |
Thanked: 35 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1
|
![]() |
2011-11-09
, 07:34
|
|
Posts: 353 |
Thanked: 166 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ India
|
#2
|
![]() |
2011-11-09
, 07:48
|
|
Posts: 311 |
Thanked: 376 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Hungary
|
#3
|
![]() |
2011-11-09
, 11:45
|
|
Posts: 337 |
Thanked: 283 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ NYC
|
#4
|
|
2011-11-09
, 23:36
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#5
|
![]() |
2011-11-10
, 02:04
|
Posts: 1,096 |
Thanked: 760 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#6
|
|
2011-11-10
, 05:30
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#7
|
the real battle for apple was flash vs h264, but now I think maybe vp8 has a good chance with webM.
![]() |
2011-11-10
, 17:41
|
Posts: 2,225 |
Thanked: 3,822 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Florida
|
#8
|
![]() |
2011-11-10
, 18:51
|
Posts: 670 |
Thanked: 367 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#9
|
|
2011-11-11
, 00:10
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#10
|
My uneducated opinion on the issue is that Flash would've prospered on mobile phones if Adobe weren't greedy ****s and allowed free-to-download flash players for mobile devices, instead of charging licensing fees for each phone.
If Adobe can make money off of Flash on desktops with free-to-download clients, they could've done the same thing with mobile devices. If they hadn't done that I'm pretty confident that Flash on mobile phones would've been far more succesful.