![]() |
2011-11-12
, 19:46
|
Posts: 72 |
Thanked: 157 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
@ Hungary
|
#152
|
well, then do this
ls -l ubuntu-11.10-preinstalled-desktop-armel+omap.img
if you get 'No such file or directory', then decompress it first
And the command sudo fdisk -l -u is informative, that should give something similar to
sudo fdisk -l -u meego-core-armv7hl-n900-1.2.90.0.0.20110824.2-mmcblk0p.raw
meego-core-armv7hl-n900-1.2.90.0.0.20110824.2-mmcblk0p.raw1 1 3583999 1791999+ 83 Linux
Partition 1 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(1023, 3, 32) logical=(27999, 3, 32)
meego-core-armv7hl-n900-1.2.90.0.0.20110824.2-mmcblk0p.raw2 3584000 3600383 8192 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Partition 2 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(1023, 3, 32) logical=(28000, 0, 1)
Partition 2 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(1023, 3, 32) logical=(28127, 3, 32)
meego-core-armv7hl-n900-1.2.90.0.0.20110824.2-mmcblk0p.raw3 3600384 3665919 32768 c W95 FAT32 (LBA)
Partition 3 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(1023, 3, 32) logical=(28128, 0, 1)
Partition 3 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(1023, 3, 32) logical=(28639, 3, 32)
If you have such an info, then you 1)shure that it is what you need, that the image is decompressed and has valid partition table 2) can correct, if necessary, offset for mounted partition and check the file system type (it the offset is correct - you multiply sectors by 512, some tutorials claim, that it works when the number of sectors taken 1 less than in the output of fdisk, one can try probing 'close numbers of sectors' (but multiplied by the same 512) - then, having loaded modules for that fs, it should be mountable with that same 'mount')
(the exaple up I give is not probably the best, as contains some errors or 'inconsistencies', still that MeeGo was installable; but it gives the partition table info, that is what you need to know from your image in order to mount then it with correct parameters. I guess that in your case offset is correct but by some reason your quite up to date host OS does not understand fs of the image - maybe indeed, the file does not exist)
![]() |
2011-11-12
, 20:18
|
|
Posts: 676 |
Thanked: 1,067 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Kyiv, Ukraine
|
#153
|
zcat precise-preinstalled-desktop-armel+omap.img.gz | head -c512 > head; file head
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to int_ua For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-11-12
, 20:22
|
Posts: 21 |
Thanked: 22 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Kyiv, Ukraine
|
#154
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Aravinda For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-11-12
, 20:23
|
Posts: 72 |
Thanked: 157 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
@ Hungary
|
#155
|
Oh, so much discussion... Will read it but now I have to say that I'm rewriting the script right now using dialog features. It seems that all the newest images have multiple partitions and thus the 111101 script is outdated.
But I just checked images with
and it may be wrong.Code:zcat precise-preinstalled-desktop-armel+omap.img.gz | head -c512 > head; file head
I want to end testing this night with all images. So I suppose you to wait a little
The Following User Says Thank You to PanzerSajt For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-11-12
, 20:26
|
|
Posts: 676 |
Thanked: 1,067 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Kyiv, Ukraine
|
#156
|
The Following User Says Thank You to int_ua For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-11-12
, 20:33
|
|
Posts: 676 |
Thanked: 1,067 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Kyiv, Ukraine
|
#157
|
![]() |
2011-11-12
, 20:49
|
Posts: 72 |
Thanked: 157 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
@ Hungary
|
#158
|
Did you check https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/n900#Hardware_support ?
It will not charge the battery yet.
![]() |
2011-11-12
, 22:03
|
|
Posts: 676 |
Thanked: 1,067 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Kyiv, Ukraine
|
#159
|
bzr branch --use-existing-dir http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~xintx-ua/ubuntu-n900/ubuntu-n900-installer
![]() |
2011-11-13
, 00:29
|
|
Posts: 676 |
Thanked: 1,067 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Kyiv, Ukraine
|
#160
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to int_ua For This Useful Post: | ||
ls -l ubuntu-11.10-preinstalled-desktop-armel+omap.img
if you get 'No such file or directory', then decompress it first
And the command sudo fdisk -l -u is informative, that should give something similar to
sudo fdisk -l -u meego-core-armv7hl-n900-1.2.90.0.0.20110824.2-mmcblk0p.raw
meego-core-armv7hl-n900-1.2.90.0.0.20110824.2-mmcblk0p.raw1 1 3583999 1791999+ 83 Linux
Partition 1 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(1023, 3, 32) logical=(27999, 3, 32)
meego-core-armv7hl-n900-1.2.90.0.0.20110824.2-mmcblk0p.raw2 3584000 3600383 8192 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Partition 2 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(1023, 3, 32) logical=(28000, 0, 1)
Partition 2 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(1023, 3, 32) logical=(28127, 3, 32)
meego-core-armv7hl-n900-1.2.90.0.0.20110824.2-mmcblk0p.raw3 3600384 3665919 32768 c W95 FAT32 (LBA)
Partition 3 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(1023, 3, 32) logical=(28128, 0, 1)
Partition 3 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(1023, 3, 32) logical=(28639, 3, 32)
If you have such an info, then you 1)shure that it is what you need, that the image is decompressed and has valid partition table 2) can correct, if necessary, offset for mounted partition and check the file system type (it the offset is correct - you multiply sectors by 512, some tutorials claim, that it works when the number of sectors taken 1 less than in the output of fdisk, one can try probing 'close numbers of sectors' (but multiplied by the same 512) - then, having loaded modules for that fs, it should be mountable with that same 'mount')
(the exaple up I give is not probably the best, as contains some errors or 'inconsistencies', still that MeeGo was installable; but it gives the partition table info, that is what you need to know from your image in order to mount then it with correct parameters. I guess that in your case offset is correct but by some reason your quite up to date host OS does not understand fs of the image - maybe indeed, the file does not exist
Last edited by Aravinda; 2011-11-12 at 19:04.