neal
|
2011-11-29
, 21:52
|
Posts: 96 |
Thanked: 107 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
|
#811
|
|
2011-11-29
, 22:11
|
|
Posts: 1,259 |
Thanked: 1,341 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#812
|
If you bothered to read my post, you'd have seen that it changes the results in about 5 categories.
The Following User Says Thank You to Helmuth For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-11-29
, 22:22
|
Posts: 456 |
Thanked: 1,580 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#813
|
Hmm... I don't understand it... again... so... I just overgone it and thought the experts, you and Wonko, are talking there to each other in your own language. :rolleyes
1 MeePasswords http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/68 -2 ClipMan http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/13 -3 MeeToDo http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/74 -4 Wallet http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/18 +2 LUCID iron http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/4 +3 ClipMan http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/13 +4 MeeToDo http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/74
1 MeePasswords http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/68 2 ClipMan http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/13 3 MeeToDo http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/74 4 Wallet http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/18
1 MeePasswords http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/68 2 LUCID iron http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/4 3 ClipMan http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/13 4 MeeToDo http://competition.meetmeego.org/submissions/74
The Following User Says Thank You to Wonko For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-11-29
, 22:37
|
|
Posts: 1,259 |
Thanked: 1,341 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#814
|
I'm not sure if it is a good idea to publish such a inofficial table. What if the official algorythm works a little bit different?
Think about the disappointment if the ranking next week differs at the official result a little bit in some parts. I would say lets wait before we praise our new King(s).
|
2011-11-30
, 05:52
|
Posts: 193 |
Thanked: 201 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Subotica, Serbia
|
#815
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mmlado For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-11-30
, 05:54
|
|
Posts: 64 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ United States
|
#816
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to antman8969 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-11-30
, 08:52
|
|
Posts: 2,361 |
Thanked: 3,746 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Berlin - Love this city!!
|
#817
|
Okay, and if we'd run the election like if it would be for just one seat ->
1st place, then for two seats -> second place, and so on?
Hi Cosimo,
You would need to explain more clearly what you are after?
You need to decide what method you want to use.
It is easy to calculate the winner, but for second, third and so on, you need to decide on how to break the ties.
Calculation is not happening on the server and is manual work.
What you can do is to download the tool (OpenSTV) and decide which method suits you the best, do the calculating and forward us the results which we can then publish.
Here are the instructions and tool you need: http://wiki.maemo.org/Maemo.org_team...ection_results
//Riku
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to zehjotkah For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-11-30
, 10:03
|
Posts: 456 |
Thanked: 1,580 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#818
|
I don't know how to explain them how to solve the problem with the ties.
As announced I still would like to use the STV system, because I think it is the fairest one, but I haven't thought about the ties.
...
So we need a rating without ties for at least 5 winners.
|
2011-11-30
, 11:36
|
|
Posts: 2,361 |
Thanked: 3,746 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Berlin - Love this city!!
|
#819
|
Having said that. Would it be agreeable to simply use the results as published by neal (with the addition of the 5th winner in case of the "4 winner categories") and send these to nemain?
|
2011-11-30
, 12:15
|
|
Posts: 738 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ London
|
#820
|