The Following User Says Thank You to noetus For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-12-07
, 14:09
|
|
Posts: 1,918 |
Thanked: 3,118 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ My pants
|
#2
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ammyt For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-12-07
, 14:19
|
Posts: 1,680 |
Thanked: 3,685 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#3
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to vi_ For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2011-12-07
, 14:23
|
|
Posts: 1,918 |
Thanked: 3,118 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ My pants
|
#4
|
![]() |
2011-12-08
, 06:15
|
Posts: 648 |
Thanked: 650 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
|
#5
|
![]() |
2011-12-08
, 10:23
|
|
Posts: 120 |
Thanked: 126 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Germany
|
#6
|
![]() |
2011-12-08
, 10:40
|
|
Posts: 738 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ London
|
#7
|
For example, there are at least four apps for the N9 that give you encrypted storage of your online passwords, etc, behind a master password, one of which is a paid app. But in my view none of these is worth installing on my N9, because none of them are compatible with any other similar application for Windows/Mac/Linux/Maemo etc that I already use or would like to use in conjunction with the N9. I don't understand why these developers have chosen to re-invent the wheel (four times over!) and each develop their own database format, when there are existing solutions off the shelf out there they could just use and which would provide this huge step-up in (in my view, necessary) functionality for the user.
![]() |
2011-12-08
, 10:43
|
|
Posts: 120 |
Thanked: 126 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ Germany
|
#8
|
![]() |
2011-12-08
, 12:57
|
Posts: 648 |
Thanked: 650 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
|
#9
|
Edit: Just got a tweet about bikini wallpapers for N9...talking about quality content :P
![]() |
2011-12-08
, 13:39
|
Posts: 36 |
Thanked: 36 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
@ KL, Msia
|
#10
|
Things seem to be a bit different with the N9. What we are seeing are quite a few apps, repeated again and again, with more basic functionality, like on other platforms (iOs, Android) where for some reason the dominant mentality is to make apps which look pretty but lack in functionality, even though the smartphones of today are as powerful as the fully fledged desktops of yesteryear. (Word/Office suites that lack basic functionality like auto-save - Hello data loss, thank you?) Often these apps are ones you have to pay for too, and you often can't test the app before paying for it.
For example, there are at least four apps for the N9 that give you encrypted storage of your online passwords, etc, behind a master password, one of which is a paid app. But in my view none of these is worth installing on my N9, because none of them are compatible with any other similar application for Windows/Mac/Linux/Maemo etc that I already use or would like to use in conjunction with the N9. I don't understand why these developers have chosen to re-invent the wheel (four times over!) and each develop their own database format, when there are existing solutions off the shelf out there they could just use and which would provide this huge step-up in (in my view, necessary) functionality for the user.
On the N900 there is a basic application like this, Password Safe, which uses the same blowfish encrypted database format that other cross-platform applications like Password Gorilla use which I have installed on my Mac and PC. It is a bit ugly, it hasn't been updated for a long while, and you have to be careful of a few bugs, but it is genuinely useful because of this important feature it gets right (like the important feature that DropN900 gets right). I keep the database file in sync between my various devices including the N900, and now I have a password database that is actually useful because it's not tied down to one device.
I don't want to denigrate the quality apps coming out for the N9, of which there are many, and which I am very, very happy about and grateful for. But I am just wondering if there isn't a general 'feel' and approach to the N9 that makes it a bit more like other smartphones (lots of useless or too-basic software, a few gems) and less like the N900 (not much software, but most of it good and genuinely useful). In fact, in the end we may be in the worst possible world with the N9, because of its orphaned status and limited market availability it will have very little software available (unlike iOS and Android but like the N900) and a relatively large proportion will be throwaway/less than useful, and some of that you have to pay for (like iOS and Android, but unlike the N900).
Maybe I have gotten things wrong. Maybe it was like this in the early days of the N900 as well, and we just have to wait for the N9 to 'mature'. I wasn't around in the early days of the N900, and I have heard people say that there is more stuff coming out for the N9 now than there was, comparatively, for the N900 at the same stage of its life-cycle. But that is about quantity, not quality, and I am interested in the issue of quality.
I'm also not a developer/programmer so perhaps I shouldn't harp on too much about apps that don't have what I consider to be basic functionality, as the developers have nevertheless put a lot of work into those apps and it may be that a lot of people might be finding them useful for their purposes, just not me.