Active Topics

 


Page 307 of 335 « First 297305306 307 308309317 Last »
Poll: Delet the values from the speedpatch?
Poll Options
Delet the values from the speedpatch?

Reply
Thread Tools
Seker_94 is offline Seker_94
2012-02-17 , 12:42
Posts: 195 | Thanked: 96 times | Joined on May 2011
#3061
Originally Posted by yrannadx View Post
The fact that the feedback is already very mixed, would bring me if I would be a developer, a question mark. While experienced contributors clearly are explaining and proving why the patch is useless, other users are claiming battery improvement. It might be that some users don't know how to load for example dsp profile, and for that reason battery patch was helping them. Others might just want to help you with good feedback just because of subjective reasons, reasons which I don't think is appropriate to raise here.
so clearly hah ?
update honey update to the latest versions

@karam
latest speedpatch version is awesome
not a single lag since yesterday

keep up the good work
 
Mohammad is offline Mohammad
2012-02-17 , 12:44
Posts: 105 | Thanked: 49 times | Joined on Jul 2011
#3062
same here
latest speedpatch rocks

thank you
 
karam is offline karam
2012-02-17 , 12:46
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#3063
expected behavior from the sp
thanks for reply
__________________
My Projects:
Speed Patch & Battery patch
Task-Swapper
Wifi-Pwner (MDK3 GUI)
Hacking Tools

Tutorials
How To Increase Camera Image Quality
How To Unblock Repositories In Forbidden Countries [Like Mine]
 
freemangordon is offline freemangordon
2012-02-17 , 13:12
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,964 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#3064
@karam - well, it took you how much, an year? To achieve what is already in stock n900. If I understand correctly, your latest speedpatch uses cgroups assigment already done by Nokia, just moves mount point from /syspart to /dev/cgroup. And puts processes started from terminal into a different cgroup. Bravo. So, will you elaborate on how this "speedpatch" makes things better than ohmd (which is responsible for process distributon along cgroups) for hildon-desktop, dialer, browser, etc?

Of course there are reports of speedup with it, AS THE STOCK NOKIA CONFIGURATION IS USED.

And BTW it would still be incompatible with any SW which tries to use /syspart for cgroup directory creation, as you are moving the mount point to a different place.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
karam is offline karam
2012-02-17 , 14:06
Posts: 856 | Thanked: 1,681 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Aleppo ,Syria
#3065
Originally Posted by freemangordon View Post
@karam - well, it took you how much, an year?
looks like yes but there is a reason for this
1- year 2009 i didn't anything about linux
2- from 2010--> 2012 exactly /4/6/2012 i have a to study for my bakaloriat
and the one in my country (f*cken hard)
ask anyone from syria
so i have a very little time to dev on N900

Originally Posted by freemangordon View Post
To achieve what is already in stock n900. If I understand correctly, your latest speedpatch uses cgroups assigment already done by Nokia, just moves mount point from /syspart to /dev/cgroup. And puts processes started from terminal into a different cgroup. Bravo. So, will you elaborate on how this "speedpatch" makes things better than ohmd (which is responsible for process distributon along cgroups) for hildon-desktop, dialer, browser, etc?
nokia didn't use cgroup
they used ohmd to do as cgroup does
but i can see that cgroup gives more responsible and performance

Originally Posted by freemangordon View Post
So, will you elaborate on how this "speedpatch" makes things better than ohmd
read 1st post

Originally Posted by freemangordon View Post
Of course there are reports of speedup with it, AS THE STOCK NOKIA CONFIGURATION IS USED.
how would it be speedup if it was AS before
i used the NOKIA configs with cgroup which gave a quite good result
PS: older version didn't use Nokia configs and though improved N900 a bit (mostly noticed :hildon-desktop)


Originally Posted by freemangordon View Post
And BTW it would still be incompatible
with any SW which tries to use /syspart for cgroup directory creation, as you are moving the mount point to a different place.
currently i haven't seen any SW that modifies /syspart
and if any future SWs
well thaey will have to check for speedpatch existen in postinst

anything else would you come up with ?
perhaps you would say "the new nokia Firmware pr1.4 WILL NOT be compatible with speedpatch in future"
__________________
My Projects:
Speed Patch & Battery patch
Task-Swapper
Wifi-Pwner (MDK3 GUI)
Hacking Tools

Tutorials
How To Increase Camera Image Quality
How To Unblock Repositories In Forbidden Countries [Like Mine]
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to karam For This Useful Post:
ammyt's Avatar
ammyt is offline ammyt
2012-02-17 , 14:22
Posts: 1,918 | Thanked: 3,118 times | Joined on Oct 2010 @ My pants
#3066
This thread is full of fail.


...and yes, I'M BACK! MWAHHAHAHAHA
__________________
[NITDroid] [My Qtlockscreen Skins] [QBW HTC Sense on Your N900!] [CPU Power Control] [Debian Packaging] [Build Me!]

Youtube Channel - Subscribe!
Retired Dev - Thanks for all the fish!
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ammyt For This Useful Post:
freemangordon is offline freemangordon
2012-02-17 , 14:32
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,964 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#3067
Originally Posted by karam View Post
.
.
.
nokia didn't use cgroup
they used ohmd to do as cgroup does
but i can see that cgroup gives more responsible and performance
Bullsh|t, do "cat /proc/mounts | grep syspart" on a device without "speedpatch" installed and you will see:

cgroup /syspart cgroup rw,freezer,memory,cpu 0 0

ohmd distributes processes along cgroups using /usr/share/policy/current/rx51/syspart.conf.

Kernel does not distribute processes to cgroups, it is userland who should do it


read 1st post
There is nothing in the OP describing how the processes are distributed along different cgroups.

how would it be speedup if it was AS before
i used the NOKIA configs with cgroup which gave a quite good result
PS: older version didn't use Nokia configs and though improved N900 a bit (mostly noticed :hildon-desktop)
By saying AS BEFORE I meant that those users have had a previous version of SP before installing latest, which reverts cgroups configuration to stock (excluding different mount point).

currently i haven't seen any SW that modifies /syspart
and if any future SWs
well thaey will have to check for speedpatch existen in postinst

anything else would you come up with ?
perhaps you would say "the new nokia Firmware pr1.4 WILL NOT be compatible with speedpatch in future"
Currently you don't see obvious things, let alone some future software. Take it as a piece of advice - do not modify system configurations which could affect current/future SW except absolutely neccessary. Which is not the case with speedpatch.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
sophocha is offline sophocha
2012-02-17 , 14:37
Posts: 559 | Thanked: 166 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Cyprus
#3068
Originally Posted by corduroysack View Post
i get over 2 days with no patches and stock nokia kernel so what's the plus?
It depends on what you are doing in those couple of days.Me for example Im using My N900 for:

-Bluetooth connection to the stereo in my car
-GPS
-Constant 3g streaming of internet radio to my stereo.
-browsing the internet
-emails
-watching some videos
-background full of widgets
-.....and so on, and I still have 2 days of battery.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sophocha For This Useful Post:
Seker_94 is offline Seker_94
2012-02-17 , 16:08
Posts: 195 | Thanked: 96 times | Joined on May 2011
#3069
@freemangordon
wtf man when speedpatch was ignoring syspart you shouted on karam because of that

now when speedpatch doesn't ignore syspart you shouted on karam again because he took a year to do so !! also you said softwares which modifies syspart conflicts with speedpatch ? but there are no any

Take it as a piece of advice - leave this person alone and let him modify system configurations that improves N900 response
n900 doesn't have a future anyway
i say if you like it use it
if you don't then don't

@ammyt
you full of Bullsh|t by the way
...and yes get the hell out of here,kid
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Seker_94 For This Useful Post:
Mohammad is offline Mohammad
2012-02-17 , 16:13
Posts: 105 | Thanked: 49 times | Joined on Jul 2011
#3070
+1 to seker_94

simple question to freemangordon now
does speedpatch fock up the system ?
yes > facepalm
no > leave this boy alone
it does nothing > another facepalm
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Mohammad For This Useful Post:
Reply
Page 307 of 335 « First 297305306 307 308309317 Last »

Tags
autobrick, awesome-script, do no install, f***epitaph, install it now, perfect_ n900, script-a-brick, very safe

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:54.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top