Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#311
Originally Posted by ZogG View Post
It was a contest and you can't claim yourself!
This is where a lot of this is going sideways!
It was NOT a contest! Period! It was an AWARD!

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/contest
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/award
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Banned | Posts: 3,412 | Thanked: 1,043 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#312
Originally Posted by nieldk View Post
1. CA Awards is NOT for what person X coded, but what he did to contribute to this community. Coders, sign up for Coding Competition.

2. There have been enough positive feedback, saying that we as a council choosed very good.

3. I have a LOT of respect for person A suggesting that person B gets an award. How come NO ONE submitted ANY suggestions of this kind, that would have been VERY non-selfish, and highly valued when we did review the applications for the awards.

4. I have NO RESPECT WHATSOEVER for person A saying 'I am a better (fill in the blanc) than person B, C .... and it is so wrong that I didnt get rewarded. That kind of behaviour is EXACTLY what at least I will NEVER reward. It is SELFISH beyond anything and NOT IN ANY WAY supporting the community.

I just got a negative respond for a job-application, surely they are wrong, and knows nothing about their own business, less to say which kind of expertise they wanted as a company. NO, they were right, and I move on to the next place!

I try to keep an objective attitude. I believe every single one of you have the right to express their opinion. As a councelar I believe I am restricted, and supposed to keep a good tone here. I will continue to do so, and spend my effort in keeping this place alive!
No i completely disagree with you because for one the N950 is a DEV KIT as already pointed out on here and the only person who should have it are developers ie coders so this is all wrong and the more i hear from this council the more i know none of you should hold this position and lets face it YOU gave yourself a dev kit so what you going to do about it?.

Really this stinks to high heaven and makes me puke everytime a council member comes on here now.

You cannot even spell your title right for gods sake Counselor

Last edited by abill_uk; 2012-06-23 at 15:40.
 
Posts: 1,539 | Thanked: 1,604 times | Joined on Oct 2011 @ With my N9
#313
Originally Posted by freemangordon View Post
Actually there was one N950 sold for 920 pounds(or was it euros?) on e-Bay yesterday, so your calculations are wrong :P. But that is not the point.

And while I agree that this was your only chance to get such a device having in mind the field you are contributing in (part of my contribution is in the same field, just the kernel is older, so I know), I really cannot understand your point re council members. Do you really think a public list with member names in the left column and their contributions in the right will do any good to the community? How exactly?

And honestly, what makes you think you deserve a CA more that SD69? I can bet it is the lack of information, as you were not here in the sad times that started approx an year ago. And I am not accusing you for being a new member, just stating the fact. You just have no clue.

I am talking about SD69 as it seems noone complains he is CA winner. Now, if the council members were not eligible for CA, that would've meant SD69 to be not eligible too. Which is unacceptable by any measurement.

And one more think - you said you bought your N9 using your hard earned money. So what? I fail to see the point, i.e. how does this fact makes you a more suitable for CA than others. I did the same, with the difference that I bought 2 N900 devices, without expecting anything in return. So did the others. Actually it was a very big surprise when qgil announced there will be 25 devices for CA, that was a totally unexpected move made by Nokia. I hope you will see my point.

Also the "harmattan community" should rethink once again what lma said in regard that it is better if the council members have harmattan devices - for good or bad all of them are N900 owners(AFAIK), they have never touched N9/50 (at least most of them). Think, isn't it possible once they have such devices, their attitude to "harmattan community" you find disrespectful now, to change. Not that I am implying they are disrespectful.

I will beg you and the others once again to stop that flamewar, it does not help anyone in any way. The same Council you're offending is supposed to lead the community in its hardest times. Think about that, not about those devices.

PS.

My post is not meant to be offensive in any way, if you find it that way, it is the language barrier
Freemangordon, what you fail to see is that no one has questioneed SD69 at all. If anyone is deserving of such an award in the council SD69 is it. So using him as an example is a horrible one.

The other thing you fail to notice is that itsnotabigtruck and e-yes are both doing things that aren't officially approved by Nokia, so outside of the community awards how are they suppose to get another device?

Especially when they have made the impossible (workarounds for aegis, and NITDROID on N9) possible?
__________________
Arie|www.everythingn9.com|Nokia N9 64GB x2|Nokia N950

@everythingn9

Temporary Inception Fix


Times Banned from TMO: 4
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Arie For This Useful Post:
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#314
Originally Posted by abill_uk View Post
No i completely disagree with you because for one the N950 is a DEV KIT as already pointed out on here and the only person who should have it are developers ie coders so this is all wrong and the more i hear from this council the more i know none of you should hold this position and lets face it YOU gave yourself a dev kit so what you going to do about it?.

Really this stinks to high heaven and makes me puke everytime a council member comes on here now.
And just because its a devkit, equals it cant be given as an award?
Puke all you want, there is medicine for that
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,539 | Thanked: 1,604 times | Joined on Oct 2011 @ With my N9
#315
Originally Posted by nieldk View Post
1. CA Awards is NOT for what person X coded, but what he did to contribute to this community. Coders, sign up for Coding Competition.

2. There have been enough positive feedback, saying that we as a council choosed very good.

3. I have a LOT of respect for person A suggesting that person B gets an award. How come NO ONE submitted ANY suggestions of this kind, that would have been VERY non-selfish, and highly valued when we did review the applications for the awards.

4. I have NO RESPECT WHATSOEVER for person A saying 'I am a better (fill in the blanc) than person B, C .... and it is so wrong that I didnt get rewarded. That kind of behaviour is EXACTLY what at least I will NEVER reward. It is SELFISH beyond anything and NOT IN ANY WAY supporting the community.

I just got a negative respond for a job-application, surely they are wrong, and knows nothing about their own business, less to say which kind of expertise they wanted as a company. NO, they were right, and I move on to the next place!

I try to keep an objective attitude. I believe every single one of you have the right to express their opinion. As a councelar I believe I am restricted, and supposed to keep a good tone here. I will continue to do so, and spend my effort in keeping this place alive!
You keep saying this all of you, but what have vi_, Hurrian, and Chemist contributed that's greater than NITDROID (e-yes) and INCEPTION (itsnotabigtruck)?

Even vi_ himself says I made changes to the wiki every now and then....

Hurrian for the life of me, I can't find any major contributions from...

Chemist for the love god he is a glorified moderator.

At this point I could have applied and done more. I am by no means a coder, but my contributions to community have been more than these 3.... combined, unless I am missing something.

And those are the 3 I researched thoroughly... The rest I will keep researching.

Please Niel, explain your contradictory statements to your behavior.
__________________
Arie|www.everythingn9.com|Nokia N9 64GB x2|Nokia N950

@everythingn9

Temporary Inception Fix


Times Banned from TMO: 4

Last edited by Arie; 2012-06-23 at 15:46.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Arie For This Useful Post:
Banned | Posts: 3,412 | Thanked: 1,043 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#316
Originally Posted by nieldk View Post
And just because its a devkit, equals it cant be given as an award?
Puke all you want, there is medicine for that
No it is not right which ever way you look at it and yes there is indeed medicine to stop this kind of puking the removal of council members who have taken this award!!!.
 
Posts: 1,539 | Thanked: 1,604 times | Joined on Oct 2011 @ With my N9
#317
Originally Posted by abill_uk View Post
No it is not right which ever way you look at it and yes there is indeed medicine to stop this kind of puking the removal of council members who have taken this award!!!.
abill, as much as I am glad you support us, please stay cordial, attacking council members achieves nothing at all.
__________________
Arie|www.everythingn9.com|Nokia N9 64GB x2|Nokia N950

@everythingn9

Temporary Inception Fix


Times Banned from TMO: 4
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Arie For This Useful Post:
ZogG's Avatar
Posts: 1,389 | Thanked: 1,857 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Israel
#318
Originally Posted by nieldk View Post
This is where a lot of this is going sideways!
It was NOT a contest! Period! It was an AWARD!

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/contest
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/award
award is winning. winning for something, than it's competition in some way. and you know anyway what i mean, can you please stop going around the topic in anyway. and answer selective parts, or on other topics you agree?
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ZogG For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,539 | Thanked: 1,604 times | Joined on Oct 2011 @ With my N9
#319
Originally Posted by ZogG View Post
can you please stop going around the topic in anyway. and answer selective parts, or on other topics you agree?
This is all the council has done with our grievances and it has been a very poor showing on their behalf's.

Outside of SD69 again, no one deserved a device on the council.

I applaud Woody for not taking a device, but his behavior is so ridiculous it's hard to take him serious.

Estel has an air of arrogance about him that makes him think he's better than everyone, so much so that he puts me on an ignore list. Nevermind the fact that he's combative beyond belief.

Next is ivgalvez and nieldk, I am eager to see how these 2 play out, because if things don't get better, well, maemo.org is more or less finished.
__________________
Arie|www.everythingn9.com|Nokia N9 64GB x2|Nokia N950

@everythingn9

Temporary Inception Fix


Times Banned from TMO: 4
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Arie For This Useful Post:
Moderator | Posts: 6,215 | Thanked: 6,400 times | Joined on Nov 2011
#320
also talking about rewards could someone enlighten me what has someone like matan done over the past 18months as his last post was on the 6th of Jan 2011.

its this old boys' mentality that is worrying everyone around here who are objecting. its not greed of devices but the fairness in judging with newer harmattan only devs not given the recognition we think they deserve especially as this seems to be their last avenue in getting a device for further development.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to thedead1440 For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread

Tags
award, community, council, device, outcry


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:51.