|
2012-06-26
, 08:50
|
|
Posts: 889 |
Thanked: 2,087 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Manchester
|
#52
|
|
2012-06-26
, 14:15
|
Posts: 293 |
Thanked: 163 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ beijing-islamabad
|
#54
|
The Following User Says Thank You to imo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-06-26
, 16:23
|
|
Posts: 1,436 |
Thanked: 3,144 times |
Joined on Jul 2005
|
#55
|
@Reggie,
The implication is that you are stepping down. I don't recall anyone else asking so just for clarity are you interested in continuing in your current role?
|
2012-06-26
, 16:25
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#56
|
Though we can't transfer data first and then ask permission after the fact. One way to do it would be to keep the old system running and set up some mechanism with which a user could initiate transfer from that to the new one. But then again, if we can keep the old system running why not, you know, just keep it running?
Any public data may be fair game, but some data, for instance email addresses, PMs and various other bits depending on profile privacy setting, was given in confidence. I don't think Nokia lawyers will allow that data to be transferred elsewhere. We may only care for email addresses, but they are kinda important...
As for the content itself, the current terms say "you license and grant Nokia and its affiliates and sub- licensees (or warrant that the owner of such rights has expressly granted) a non-exclusive, royalty-free and free of charge, perpetual, worldwide, irrevocable, and fully sublicensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, communicate to the public, make available, publish" ((emphasis mine) which seems fine to me (disclaimer: IANAL). But what about users registered / content posted before this became talk.maemo.org? Have they agreed to similar terms (I haven't kept them unfortunately) or could someone appear out of the blue and say we are violating their rights?
|
2012-06-27
, 09:58
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#57
|
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post: | ||
Estel, imo, ivgalvez, kevloral, lma, MartinK, mattaustin, Mentalist Traceur, misterc, mr id, pelago, pycage, qwazix, Reggie, saponga, Watchmaker, woody14619 |
|
2012-06-27
, 10:09
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#58
|
Keep in mind there are over 60,000 registered members. We obviously want an archive of postings and to reserve user names. People interested in migrating and keeping their same username are probably going to have to take some affirmative action to do so. We will want to use the email address to verify identity. Cooperation from Nokia seems necessary to do that.
|
2012-06-27
, 10:29
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#59
|
- The forum has its own list, and actually I believe Nokia has little to do with it.
- Garage and Bugs have their own lists
but do you need these services forward?
- About the wiki you could just copy whatever makes sense to keep, and we good with it. Or have a database dump of the content and export it to a new MediaWiki, starting with new users there.
- Users karma would be perhaps lost, but do you mind?
The part that looks more complex is the Autobuilder + Downloads. If a new infra is created based on OBS then perhaps there is a way to transfer all the existing packages and restart the list of owners?
|
2012-06-27
, 11:08
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#60
|
Tags |
goodbye nokia, responsibility |
|
As for the content itself, the current terms say "you license and grant Nokia and its affiliates and sub- licensees (or warrant that the owner of such rights has expressly granted) a non-exclusive, royalty-free and free of charge, perpetual, worldwide, irrevocable, and fully sublicensable right to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, communicate to the public, make available, publish" ((emphasis mine) which seems fine to me (disclaimer: IANAL). But what about users registered / content posted before this became talk.maemo.org? Have they agreed to similar terms (I haven't kept them unfortunately) or could someone appear out of the blue and say we are violating their rights?