The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-07-13
, 21:58
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#112
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-07-13
, 22:30
|
|
Posts: 1,389 |
Thanked: 1,857 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Israel
|
#113
|
Well, as a regular Community Member - again I must say I expected answers like that.
For me, calling fellow Councilor a "weight in leg when trying to outrun shark" , that You're wondering if "is best to drop now, or swim to the beach with weight attached to the leg" - in public, Councils thread = doing murky, silly, and cowardly backstab - is totally out of line.
Let put aside Woody's exaggerated self-confidence - the only way you could "drop that weight" is via next election, so You're absolutely sure, that You (in current 4 people Council squad) would be elected, and me not. I'm sure, that Community is wise enough, to properly judge such unjustified, overgrown ego.
But, in case of any misunderstanding, it's a matter of one-liner saying that "it wasn't what I mean, and mistercrap interpreted it wrongly." Or, saying "It is *exactly* what I mean, and he properly assigned You being "weight". It doesn't require extensive pre-meditation.
It isn't case - as You all try to show it - of "request at wrong moment". Despite importance of clearing such thing, as extreme disrespect and - in fact - sneaky trolling against other Councilor in Council's thread, I've asked to talk about in in idle moment, where Council had *nothing* to do. Your (=whole current Council) reaction on IRC logs showed exactly, that it isn't problem of lacking time, but lacking courage.
Trying to explain it like this, is just trying to - cowardly - cover lack of enough honor, to stand behind own words.
But, Woody's stance isn't reason for my decision - it is about reaction of other Councilors, when such problem appeared. Putting head into sand is something, that made me stop wanting to work with those people, immediately.
C'mon, either we're team, or - if we tolerate such things like Woody did in this thread - we can as good disband. I'm not going to wait, until all decide to disband, so I'm stepping down myself.
---
I respect Your (all 4) right to think, that I was "weight in the leg" - so, please, respect my decision, by not suggesting murky things about my reasoning. And be glad, that You're free to run. In fact, I am - and whole Community is - eager to see that "run" made by Council.
Just remember - in case of failure, You wan't have anyone to blame for.
/Estel
Ps.
When I mentioned trying to "talk it out privately" with other Councilors during last week, I meant council@maemo.org mail. Privately = not in public. When it failed, I tried to use proper Communication channel - Council meeting. Please, do not suggest, that I was plotting something "behind". No offense taken, I understand, that man judges by himself.
If anyone from current Council feel it worth to continue this discussion, my PM is open and inviting.
|
2012-07-14
, 04:14
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#114
|
Texrat, maybe You're "reading between the lines" more, than people intended to put there?
|
2012-07-14
, 06:56
|
Moderator |
Posts: 6,215 |
Thanked: 6,400 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#115
|
The Following User Says Thank You to thedead1440 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-07-14
, 07:15
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#116
|
just to throw this point across before it causes further misunderstandings...
does Estel still keep his device that was awarded to him as he was a member of the Council...from the outset it looks like that while we were debating in the CA thread he resisted everyone's efforts to step down or give up his device but from "one phrase uttered by woody" he is stepping down with the knowledge he is keeping his device...
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-07-14
, 08:48
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#117
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-07-14
, 12:01
|
|
Posts: 1,625 |
Thanked: 998 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#118
|
Everyone seems to get (and agrees to) the implied messages, except the person himself.
In this case, that sole person needs to find other individuals that agrees with his (unrealistic) views; if he does not succeed in doing so, then he must accept that the general view is the consensus and use this for his self-correction.
|
2012-07-14
, 17:58
|
Posts: 1,397 |
Thanked: 2,126 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Dublin, Ireland
|
#119
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to ivgalvez For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-07-15
, 16:58
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#120
|
Which is better to do when you see a shark: To attempt swim toward the shore with one leg weighted, hoping the weight will fall off as you swim? Or to take the time to remove the weight in hopes that you can then out-swim a now closer shark?
<merciful snip - envy and bad will die last, eh?>
<merciful snip>
<extremely merciful snip>
Tags |
ask council, ask the council, community, councilors, questions |
|
Certainly - repeating a request over and over - doesnt mean you get what you want at a specific time. Any parent can confirm that
And, no, there have been no "peer-to-peer" murky discussions, excepth those that you apparently tried to initiate with "talks with other councelars privately", at least I was not invited to that party? That also tells something about councelars individual moral, or some at least.