|
2012-09-18
, 22:22
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 84 times |
Joined on Aug 2012
|
#1432
|
with lithium no need to do that at all, i have all kinds of lithium for these tests and for electric vehicles and DIY flashlights amps etc...
No matter how you use them they will not have any weird effects like the old crappy NiCD/NiHM battery's, only 2 things to keep in mind:
Don't go under 2V (ill say 2.5V to be safe) and don't go over 4.23V then all is good.
|
2012-09-19
, 08:51
|
|
Posts: 1,503 |
Thanked: 2,688 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Denmark
|
#1433
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dr_frost_dk For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-09-19
, 16:48
|
Posts: 2,290 |
Thanked: 4,134 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ UK
|
#1434
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sixwheeledbeast For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-09-20
, 17:43
|
Posts: 61 |
Thanked: 64 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ EU
|
#1435
|
In Your case, last report is 225 mAh *more* than expected, for 1500 mAh, single-cell battery, used heavily, as You said. That result would be ground-breaking, and would require ultra-low internal resistance inside polarcells, + some other voodoo doing its job.
While I remember shadowjk mentioning very good (low) internal resistance of polarcells (or was it japod? ), it's still hardly to believe *so good* results.
---
Summary - I have no idea WTF Give it 2-3 more calibrating shots, and keep us reported. It's very intriguing.
/Estel
The Following User Says Thank You to yrannadx For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-09-22
, 14:13
|
|
Posts: 102 |
Thanked: 248 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
@ Eindhoven, Netherlands
|
#1436
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ariadeno For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-09-22
, 20:06
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#1437
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-09-27
, 06:12
|
Posts: 395 |
Thanked: 509 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Brisbane, Australia
|
#1438
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to azkay For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-09-27
, 22:38
|
Posts: 543 |
Thanked: 151 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Germany
|
#1439
|
|
2012-09-28
, 00:54
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#1440
|
Tags |
battery, battery test, best battery, good bad ugly, modding, mugen battery, scud battery, tool got banned, yasirrfc |
|
But, bnf (and bq27200.sh) are using i2c to access raw values reported by chip, then, bnf calculates mAh internally, always doing it the same way. It doesn't depend on newest charging/measuring kernel modules by Pali, so updates to kernel-power shouldn't affect it (in fact, it doesn't require KP at all).
So, no idea what could have changed. For sure, our internal chips didn't, scripts too... WTF?
/Estel
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!