Reply
Thread Tools
CommunityCouncil's Avatar
Posts: 153 | Thanked: 1,916 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#1
Due to time demands meeting minutes were not produced until 9-25.* Sorry for the delay!

Meeting held on FreeNode, channel #maemo-meeting (logs)
Attending: Woody14619, SD69, ZogG, djszapi, DocScrutinizer

Pre-meeting discussion:

  • A primary worker in QT5 development takes issue with those getting awards for QT5 development, but not helping on porting for the N9.
Summary of topics (ordered by discussion):

  • Elections (Council and CC)
  • Update on bylaws
  • Misc topics
Topic 1 (Elections)

  • Woody14619 has updated scripts to allow single-token to multi-election voting.
  • The CC will be setup and in effect will be a test of the system, having 7 elections on one token.
Topic 2 (Bylaws)

  • SD69 will have yet another revision out this weekend, shaping up nicely.
Topic 3 (Misc)

  • SD69 discusses issues around Foundation setup.
  • OBS and such are discussed, movement to continue collaboration with Mer touched on.
  • Discussion from before the meeting continues...


Link: Original article.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to CommunityCouncil For This Useful Post:
Moderator | Posts: 6,215 | Thanked: 6,400 times | Joined on Nov 2011
#2
Dear Council,

Can it be clarified if the changes discussed in the By-Laws thread will be added to the By-Laws as the logs for September 7th meeting show that there was a discussion to settle by-laws by the 15th...

That would mean some changes not being accepted...

Thanks in advance!
 
woody14619's Avatar
Posts: 1,455 | Thanked: 3,309 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Rochester, NY
#3
Originally Posted by thedead1440 View Post
Can it be clarified if the changes discussed in the By-Laws thread will be added to the By-Laws as the logs for September 7th meeting show that there was a discussion to settle by-laws by the 15th...
The discussion was that we would prefer to have the bylaws settled by the 15th so that potential nominees would know what they were getting into. While that was (is still) the case, as the bylaws must be approved and brought into being by the Board at their first meeting, small tweaks and changes can (and probably will) be made right up to that point. Including suggestions from the TMO thread (all of which are in the current version, which I will be re-posting for a final go-round later today.)
__________________
Maemo Council Member: May 2012 - November 2012
Hildon Foundation founding member.
Hildon Foundation Board of Directors: March 2013 - Jan 15, 2014
 
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#4
Originally Posted by thedead1440 View Post
Dear Council,

Can it be clarified if the changes discussed in the By-Laws thread will be added to the By-Laws as the logs for September 7th meeting show that there was a discussion to settle by-laws by the 15th...

That would mean some changes not being accepted...

Thanks in advance!
Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
<SNIP>The bylaws,FYI, are an odd exception in this case. Bylaws for the group must be approved of by the first Board to become effective, so they can be discussed, reviewed, and revised right up to that first meeting. That's the only reason that discussion is still going on as well. I personally wanted those nailed down by the 17th as well, so people nominated for the positions would know what they were in for. But legally, they don't need to be finished until the first day the Board is active. So let me make it crystal clear here, for all to read:
The bylaws MUST be finished by October 12th!<SNIP>
And thus endeth probably my last post at TMO for quite some time...
Unless I have time for some final commentary in the by-laws thread next Mon (assuming it's still cool, given the new absolute deadline of Oct 12th).

*EDIT*
Beaten by Woody himself

Last edited by jalyst; 2012-09-26 at 17:20.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:23.