|
2012-10-02
, 19:52
|
Moderator |
Posts: 6,215 |
Thanked: 6,400 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#2
|
|
2012-10-02
, 20:02
|
Posts: 329 |
Thanked: 422 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ derpton
|
#3
|
|
2012-10-02
, 20:08
|
|
Posts: 2,448 |
Thanked: 9,523 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Wigan, UK
|
#5
|
The Following 34 Users Say Thank You to marxian For This Useful Post: | ||
benny1967, ck2nb, dannejanne, don_falcone, ed_ab23, freemangordon, fw190, handaxe, HELLASISGREECE, imo, leoniedelt, MaddogG, Maj3stic, Mentalist Traceur, misiak, misterc, Mr.Pancake, mr_pingu, nkirk, panjgoori, pantera1989, patlak, petur, ranbaxy, Rauha, rcolistete, reinob, shanttu, sjgadsby, szopin, volt, XiliX, zwer |
|
2012-10-02
, 20:20
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#6
|
Real multitasking is not about the task-switching UI, it's about who controls which processes are allowed to continue running in the background. If the OS terminates processes that the user started without confirmation from the user, then that OS does not provide real multitasking.
End of.
|
2012-10-02
, 20:22
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#7
|
|
2012-10-02
, 20:22
|
Posts: 479 |
Thanked: 1,284 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ Enschede, The Netherlands
|
#8
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzzillogic For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-10-02
, 20:28
|
|
Posts: 2,448 |
Thanked: 9,523 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Wigan, UK
|
#9
|
Real multitasking is not about background processes. It's about interaction between the UI, user and number of different tasks performed between these two in a simple, fast and natural way.
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to marxian For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-10-02
, 21:00
|
Posts: 293 |
Thanked: 163 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ beijing-islamabad
|
#10
|
Especially Estel's.
Thanks.