![]() |
2012-10-11
, 11:56
|
Posts: 322 |
Thanked: 218 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#52
|
I assume you really mean the 5800 which had a 434MHz processor, 128 MB of RAM, resistive touch screen and no GPU.
I have used Android on a device with twice this spec and it was CHUFFING TORTURE.
The 5800 was great budget device of course, full of functionality, but stop pretending this was ever an iPhone competitor. Again it is a testament to Symbian you can get acceptable performance from such extraordinarily modest hardware.
![]() |
2012-10-11
, 13:00
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 552 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
|
#53
|
![]() |
2012-10-11
, 13:02
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 552 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
|
#54
|
|
2012-10-11
, 13:04
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#55
|
Irrelevant, if you want to know if your sales have grown you compare them to your own sales of a previous period.
|
2012-10-11
, 13:49
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#56
|
![]() |
2012-10-11
, 14:41
|
Moderator |
Posts: 6,215 |
Thanked: 6,400 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#57
|
n8 was doing OK because they kept cutting prices and profits were going downwards. they knew they couldnt do this forever.....
s/n8/lumia\ 800/
![]() |
2012-10-11
, 15:26
|
Posts: 322 |
Thanked: 218 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#58
|
Separate GPU, no multitasking, no USB, no bluetooth and all apps had to be written in Objective-C. Not only that but it pre-dated the 5800 by 15 months. Thank you, you emphasise my point, NOKIA were trying to shoehorn a smartphone OS into hardware more appropriate to the previous years feature phones.
Android SUCKS on low grade hardware, it did then and it does now.
|
2012-10-11
, 17:32
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#59
|
|
2012-10-11
, 19:14
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#60
|
That will answer if it were a loss or flat percentage of growth.