![]() |
2008-01-21
, 07:11
|
Posts: 214 |
Thanked: 30 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#41
|
![]() |
2008-01-21
, 14:42
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#42
|
![]() |
2008-01-21
, 15:11
|
Posts: 227 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
|
#43
|
![]() |
2008-01-21
, 15:56
|
Posts: 162 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
|
#44
|
I'll bet you that those who are saying "I don't get it" have never lugged a 17" Macbook pro through airports twice a week. Add in my nearly 40 year old spine with a ruptured disk and this thing looks pretty good to me.
![]() |
2008-01-21
, 16:28
|
Posts: 227 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
|
#45
|
In that case your spine would be wanting an Asus Eee: it weighs a whole pound less than the MB Air.
![]() |
2008-01-21
, 17:18
|
Posts: 64 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#46
|
![]() |
2008-01-21
, 21:39
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#47
|
apple is speculating with microns or mm's. Who darn care about 3 mm plus, or 1 inch plus screen diagonal. 13.5' screen is the same small screen, you need to atatch secondary moonitor to have serious work on it. Who cares about 1mm minus, if it weights the same more than kilo. Only design geeks to my mind
![]() |
2008-01-22
, 01:01
|
|
Posts: 1,361 |
Thanked: 115 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
#48
|
![]() |
2008-01-22
, 01:50
|
Posts: 214 |
Thanked: 30 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#49
|
![]() |
2008-01-22
, 03:16
|
|
Posts: 1,361 |
Thanked: 115 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
#50
|