The Following User Says Thank You to Alecsandru For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-07-22
, 21:02
|
Posts: 114 |
Thanked: 298 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Berlin
|
#72
|
![]() |
2013-07-22
, 22:01
|
|
Posts: 439 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Oct 2012
|
#73
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Alecsandru For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-07-22
, 22:11
|
Posts: 114 |
Thanked: 298 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Berlin
|
#74
|
tried that with ham , not working , extracting and replacing the usr/lib/x11 worked , figured that before reading your post(i f.....g love maemo) , previous post was posted from the phone that's why i've quoted wrong post , your new x11 is completly different to structure compared with nokia's one , i'm waiting for you to succede with your qt5 port , i'm studying it for my first application
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to frafI For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-07-22
, 22:48
|
|
Posts: 439 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Oct 2012
|
#75
|
![]() |
2013-07-22
, 22:50
|
Posts: 114 |
Thanked: 298 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Berlin
|
#76
|
by the way remove those packages from the repo , you can't upgrade other things automatically without those. i appreciate your work
![]() |
2013-07-23
, 10:15
|
Posts: 3,328 |
Thanked: 4,476 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Poland
|
#77
|
2) Putting them to /opt/xcb only helps if we can force the fully qualified soname or use LD_LIBRARY_PATH, I'd like to avoid both. But I've no problem putting the renamed libXc11.so.6 (and the xcb part) to another directory and change the paths for ldconfig, if you think this is better than optify.
3) I thought, libxau and other cause severe problems. However if they only cause problems on the stock kernel we might consider a power kernel only (and thumb only) build.
Note however that the way I've currently solved this is not a big burden for the future as a simple symlink from libXc11* to the new X11 libs can solve this (if and only if we can use them as a drop in replacement of the properly named old libs).
I'd like to make a first usable (for developers) version of Qt5 as soon as possible, because porting X11, porting Qt5 itself and porting and/or creating application with Qt5 are things that can be done in parallel by different groups. And the possible users of Qt5 (esp. QtQuick2) outnumber any other group. So if they can program slightly buggy but working programs with a (slightly) buggy Qt5 on an old (and buggy?) X11, we'll have actually stable, usable programs if we switch the back-ends to less buggy ones.
TL;DR: This works for now, helps bringing Qt5 to devs and we can change it later (without too much effort).
![]() |
2013-07-23
, 19:49
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#78
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-07-24
, 09:03
|
Posts: 114 |
Thanked: 298 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Berlin
|
#79
|
frafl, I appreciate your work, but never, ever, upload system package to extras-devel. You might have not notice it yet (as they had problems in determining who did that), but you have wraith of whole maemo management on your back, already
/Estel
The Following User Says Thank You to frafI For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-07-24
, 20:10
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#80
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
how fix to this?
8GB OPTFS@ext4(*performance mount options)
overclock: cpu[125 - 1,150(*VDD1)+Dsp overclock
CSSU-T latest version
Last edited by Alecsandru; 2013-07-22 at 20:58.