lancewex
|
2013-08-14
, 14:07
|
Posts: 661 |
Thanked: 690 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#301
|
The Following User Says Thank You to lancewex For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-08-14
, 15:15
|
|
Posts: 708 |
Thanked: 125 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
@ Too Close To D.C
|
#302
|
|
2013-08-14
, 15:33
|
|
Posts: 6,447 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#303
|
|
2013-08-14
, 15:39
|
|
Posts: 708 |
Thanked: 125 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
@ Too Close To D.C
|
#304
|
Define "fails".
"We have achieved the fundraising goal but encountered some technical difficulties. We have to delay the launch till... err.. Q4/2023. Your money will be held in the escrow account until then."
|
2013-08-14
, 15:42
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#305
|
What we need is an Intel/Linux Haswell based mobile. I've been unable to find any MHL transmitter packages with the bandwidth to do more than 1080p@60Hz, and that just kind of seems limited/lowest common denominator.
As soon as Edge is in my hand, i'd still be looking for an enthusiast, converged device that could drive 2560x1440 at least
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to qwazix For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-08-14
, 16:34
|
Posts: 35 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ North America
|
#306
|
24" capable of that resolution without having to sell a kidney
...beaten to death like phone ppi... distinguish a GS3 screen from a GS4 and I couldn't.
|
2013-08-14
, 21:15
|
|
Posts: 1,789 |
Thanked: 1,699 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#307
|
I would first like to be able to actually purchase a pc monitor around 24" capable of that resolution without having to sell a kidney. Right now everything from 5" to 80" is 1080p
This has become ridiculous. People don't yet care to search for hi-res monitors because the hype didn't get there yet, and as such the manufacturers are still charging too much for them.
I'm tired of the obsessions of a few tech reviewers: ppi was nothing that was mentioned and reviewers even panned some laptops with higher ppi for displaying things too small, instead of teaching the users how to crank up the dpi scaling in Windows. Back in 2006 the N95 had half the ppi of the N93. The reason we still don't have decent 200+ ppi screens is reviews. Same story with the processor (N96 lost one processor and the GPU to the N95). Then there's the obsession with thinness (one reviewer called the 12mm thickness of the 1020 "abysmal") which has resulted to either flimsy tinfoil-thick battery covers or loss of battery swap/μSD.
There are things that are long overdue like PC ppi and others that are beaten to death like phone ppi. 441 is a ridiculous value, and frankly I tried much to distinguish a GS3 screen from a GS4 and I couldn't. On the other hand, color reproduction would be way better if they didn't go number whoring and chose to go for 720p RGB instead of 1080 pentile (much less subpixels and thus easier to produce).
Sorry for the big rant, but I think it's a bit relevant as the edge wasn't a phone that looked liked whoring for the latest buzz-features, and rather tried to make an own statement.
Sad it won't probably make it.
|
2013-08-14
, 21:25
|
Posts: 35 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ North America
|
#308
|
|
2013-08-15
, 00:32
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#309
|
|
2013-08-16
, 05:07
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#310
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave999 For This Useful Post: | ||