|
2013-08-28
, 11:02
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#1922
|
@Lumiaman
When you have no facts to point to you just make stuff up.
Who is being dishonest again?
rgds
![]() |
2013-08-28
, 11:13
|
|
Posts: 289 |
Thanked: 185 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ Worldwide
|
#1923
|
![]() |
2013-08-28
, 11:56
|
Posts: 131 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1924
|
|
2013-08-28
, 12:21
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#1925
|
![]() |
2013-08-28
, 13:22
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#1926
|
![]() |
2013-08-28
, 13:49
|
|
Posts: 1,789 |
Thanked: 1,699 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#1927
|
![]() |
2013-08-28
, 14:14
|
Posts: 131 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1928
|
![]() |
2013-08-28
, 14:40
|
Posts: 496 |
Thanked: 651 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ London
|
#1929
|
What do you think about this quote genius:
"Already in 2005 and 2006 it was obvious for some people that Symbian is an old and outdated platform. Adding an effective touchscreen user interface to Symbian would have been challenging"
What does it mean that "adding an effective touchscreen user interface to Symbian would have been challenging in 2005 or 2006?" Didn't Symbian have a touchscreen UI already in 2001-2002 (UIQ, e.g. the P800, P900) and in 2003-2004 (Hildon, Series 90, e.g. the 7700, 7710)? Can ANYONE name a MORE EFFECTIVE touchscreen user interface at that time (and in the next couple of years) than the ones on the UIQ and Series 90?
http://my-symbian.com/uiq/intro_p800.php
http://my-symbian.com/uiq/intro_p900.php
http://my-symbian.com/s90/7710_review.php
So the truth is that Symbian had the most innovative touchscreen UIs at that time (both stylus operated UIQ and finger operated S90). Why were they both KILLED by Nokia (and by SonyEricsson, but not without Nokia's role in it) and instead of that the WORST and SIMPLEST Symbian version, the one that was NEVER MEANT TO SUPPORT TOUCH was chosen as the ONLY one for further development (both by Nokia and SE) and to create touch UI for it from the scratch... only those who decided so could explain. And YES, it surely was "challenging" to add an effective touch UI to Series 60. Surely much more challenging than if the Series 90 or UIQ, with their EXISTING, advanced touch UIs were chosen instead of Series 60 and further developed.
![]() |
2013-08-28
, 16:12
|
Posts: 131 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#1930
|
![]() |
Tags |
bring me beer, downward spiral, elop is nero, let's talk bs, lumiadickweed, lumiatard, nero fiddling, nokia bears, nokiastockrock, thanks for asha |
|
With every thread .....more facts from you