|
2013-06-25
, 11:43
|
Banned |
Posts: 280 |
Thanked: 295 times |
Joined on Apr 2013
@ Romania
|
#12
|
Not to be sceptic or complain, but ... are You for real will mantain this thread about hardware (...) problems, with that achievement on Your account:
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...10&postcount=4
?
In first post You add info about factory faulty devices with revision 2101, where I'm currently running on N900 rev. 2101 (charged once a day, connected to PC at least 5 times a week) and not even sign of any mUSB problems (---). See this post for example:
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...8&postcount=10
You have to invite more then one "security officers" with huge reputation on TMO to make this thread worth reading. And there's even more to this, please know that it might acctually breake device or two if You will continue.
Saying once more, I don't want to complain or disturb in (I think great thread and wiki page idea) - but it should be done by right people - with all respect to You of course.
So maybe add some info to first post, that You have been writing funny and unreal stories on TMO asking for help when You didn't actually need any, and that all info here should be double checked, consulted with (here You can copy/paste reputable members nicks). Don't get angry, just think about it man.
|
2013-06-25
, 13:13
|
|
Posts: 1,239 |
Thanked: 1,278 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
@ Balochistan
|
#13
|
Open terminal and type "cat /proc/cpuinfo" and check revision ( since 2101 and 2104 are factory faulty)
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to panjgoori For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-06-25
, 13:33
|
Banned |
Posts: 280 |
Thanked: 295 times |
Joined on Apr 2013
@ Romania
|
#14
|
Not all N900's with hardware revision 2101 and 2104 are faulty. My N900's hardware revision is also 2101 and i'm using it for more than 2 years now and haven't encountered any USB port problems yet.
edit. why not just post thread link and write a small description that what information is available in the given thread ? i think its better than copy pasting.
|
2013-06-25
, 13:54
|
Banned |
Posts: 280 |
Thanked: 295 times |
Joined on Apr 2013
@ Romania
|
#15
|
|
2013-07-04
, 21:30
|
Banned |
Posts: 280 |
Thanked: 295 times |
Joined on Apr 2013
@ Romania
|
#16
|
|
2013-10-21
, 17:49
|
Posts: 2 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Oct 2013
|
#17
|
Tags |
hw problem, nokia n900 |
|
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...10&postcount=4
?
In first post You add info about factory faulty devices with revision 2101, where I'm currently running on N900 rev. 2101 (charged once a day, connected to PC at least 5 times a week) and not even sign of any mUSB problems (---). See this post for example:
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...8&postcount=10
You have to invite more then one "security officers" with huge reputation on TMO to make this thread worth reading. And there's even more to this, please know that it might acctually breake device or two if You will continue.
Saying once more, I don't want to complain or disturb in (I think great thread and wiki page idea) - but it should be done by right people - with all respect to You of course.
So maybe add some info to first post, that You have been writing funny and unreal stories on TMO asking for help when You didn't actually need any, and that all info here should be double checked, consulted with (here You can copy/paste reputable members nicks). Don't get angry, just think about it man.