![]() |
2013-11-28
, 12:47
|
Posts: 49 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Switzerland
|
#242
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Venty For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-11-28
, 12:49
|
Posts: 49 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Switzerland
|
#243
|
We aim for monthly. Whether or not we can pull it off, let's see. I'm cautiously optimistic.
The Following User Says Thank You to Venty For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-11-28
, 12:54
|
Posts: 1,400 |
Thanked: 3,751 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Arctic cold of northern .fi
|
#244
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Rauha For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-11-28
, 13:00
|
Posts: 466 |
Thanked: 335 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#245
|
This is just a general comment, but it does involve MMS. This is also a personal statement, not something necessarily company-endorsed.
Shipping a working mobile OS is already a lot of work. The more features you add, the more work is involved - but the amount of people you have to split that work in our case is quite constant (and the lesson enshrined by the "mythical man month" is that adding a bunch more people won't necessarily solve that problem any more quickly - it may make the situation worse, even).
So you have three essential parameters you can tweak: features (+/-), quality (+/-), schedule (+/-). Pick any two.
We chose to ship something that we hope is of an acceptable quality on our target schedule, and look at adding more features through software updates. Hopefully when we look back at this in 6 months, that'll seem like a good choice.
![]() |
2013-11-28
, 13:03
|
|
Posts: 193 |
Thanked: 203 times |
Joined on Jun 2012
@ Sofia, Bulgaria
|
#246
|
I for one am happy that you guys chose to do everything on schedule. While I will be missing some features at first, I know you'll be improving on the OS all the time so no worries.
I'd have hated for that thing to happen to you (I was sort of expecting it really) that is super common to a lot of startups with ambitious new product (think RaspberryPi, Ouya, etc....), when rollout and delivery is delayed and delayed again for nobody cares what reasons. I'm pretty sure your proving that you can deliver as planned will be a strong selling point in the future, and I congratulate you on that. In the meantime, I count on Sailfish becoming full-featured soon enough!
Dear Enemy: may the Lord hate you and all your kind, may you be turned orange in hue, and may your head fall off at an awkward moment.
How to tell Heretics from Catholics?Papal legate Arnaud Amalric answers :Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.(Kill them all, the Lord will recognise His own.)
“Get thee to Hell, where Asmodeus himself may suckle upon your diseased teat!”
Barnabas Collins
![]() |
2013-11-28
, 13:10
|
Posts: 728 |
Thanked: 1,217 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
|
#247
|
![]() |
2013-11-28
, 13:11
|
Posts: 466 |
Thanked: 335 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#248
|
in parallel: port fMMS (MMS hopefully from Maemo) -> dev fMMS
eventually integrate MMS -> Jolla
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bennypr0fane For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2013-11-28
, 13:11
|
Posts: 385 |
Thanked: 426 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Gothenburg, Sweden
|
#249
|
![]() |
2013-11-28
, 13:16
|
Posts: 388 |
Thanked: 1,340 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Finland
|
#250
|
So you have three essential parameters you can tweak: features (+/-), quality (+/-), schedule (+/-). Pick any two.
We chose to ship something that we hope is of an acceptable quality on our target schedule, and look at adding more features through software updates. Hopefully when we look back at this in 6 months, that'll seem like a good choice.
![]() |
Tags |
jolla, review, sailfish, the other half, user experience |
|
i'm a Qt expert and former Jolla sailor (forever sailing, in spirit).
if you like, read more about me.
if you find me entertaining, or useful, thank me. if you don't, then tell me why.