Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
tissot's Avatar
Posts: 1,839 | Thanked: 2,432 times | Joined on May 2009
#51
I don't know single phone top of my head that supports EU LTE bands and a single US carrier LTE bands. US has it really complicated as big carriers have cut some of the frequencies to different bands for separate carriers.
Anyways thinking on what SoC they have on Jolla LTE should not work over in US.

Do we know Jolla hasn't gone through FCC? I don't remember how it went back in the N93 etc days when plenty of American's did order their Nokia's from overseas. N95 at least had its US versions.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to tissot For This Useful Post:
Posts: 728 | Thanked: 1,217 times | Joined on Oct 2011
#52
Originally Posted by minimos View Post
Err.... there is FCC.
Without FCC declaration of conformity a device generating RF emission cannot be used in US territory.
And considering that we are talking about a mobile phone, it is not exactly practical try to hide from it
I don't think the FCC can enforce any individual who brings a phone from abroad to do anything. Think about tourism for exmaple. What happens if I get a Jolla and decide to go to the US for a holiday/business meeting/etc.? The immigration forms ask a lot of questions about drugs and previous criminal convictions but nothing about devices that aren't approved by the FCC.
I doubt it's even legal that the FCC can confiscate anything that you own. If anything, it's impractical. If you get a Jolla, in fact, if a buch of you get a Jolla and it works in the US, it will be a drop in the ocean as far as RF transmissions are concerned. To be honest, I wouldn't worry, but I don't live there so it's up to the invidual ;-)

This changes a lot when you are commercialising devices, however.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ggabriel For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,298 | Thanked: 2,277 times | Joined on May 2011
#53
I wonder what is the SAR value for Jolla with LTE + WiFi hotspot working at the same time, to pass the FCC it will have to be not higher than 1.6 W / kg.
 
mrsellout's Avatar
Posts: 889 | Thanked: 2,087 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Manchester
#54
Originally Posted by shmerl View Post
If these SoCs don't have modem variations, then the specs can look like this:

* GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850/900/1800/1900 MHz)
* 3G-HSPA+ (850/900/1900/2100 MHz)
* 4G-LTE (700/1700/2100 MHz)
The specs for the HTC First and One mini are below, and for the latter there are indeed variations by region. As someone who has recently signed up to a contract with Vodafone UK (800/2600MHZ LTE), I hope they've used the European variant in the One mini.

http://www.htc.com/us/smartphones/htc-first/#specs

UMTS/HSPA/HSPA+: 850/1900/2100 MHz
GSM/GPRS/EDGE: 850/900/1800/1900 MHz
LTE: 700/1700/2100 MHz

http://www.htc.com/us/smartphones/htc-one-mini/#specs
2G/ 2.5G - GSM/GPRS/EDGE:

  • 850/900/1800/1900 MHz
3G/ 3.5G - UMTS/ HSPA:

  • EMEA: 900/1900/2100 MHz with HSPA+ up to 42 Mbps
  • Asia: 850/1900/2100 MHz with HSPA+ up to 42 Mbps
  • AT&T: 850/1900/2100 with HSPA+ up to 42/5.76 Mbps
4G - LTE:

  • EMEA: 800/1800/2600 MHz
  • Asia: 900/1800/2100/2600 MHz
  • AT&T: 700/850/AWS/1900 MHz

 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mrsellout For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#55
Pretty sure whole EU will be supported (eu commission and regulatory bodies) us is wild west once again (ounce again, didn't you guys end with imperial ties?)
 
Posts: 281 | Thanked: 679 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#56
SAR to head 0.546 W/kg, body 1.470 W/kg (See http://jolla.com/guide/#sec-17). To head it is less than N95! See http://www.nokia.com/global/about-no...r-information/

Last edited by cy8aer; 2013-11-29 at 21:23.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to cy8aer For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,298 | Thanked: 2,277 times | Joined on May 2011
#57
cy8aer: That may be SAR during regular operation, unless they meant maximum possible use case. SAR of mobile radio + WiFi is always higher than just mobile.
 
Posts: 1,298 | Thanked: 2,277 times | Joined on May 2011
#58
From the community FAQ:

Quoting the sticker on the box: "GSM: 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, UMTS: 900/2100 MHz"
That's not good for T-Mobile really. Most probable result - we'll have to wait for another production batch.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to shmerl For This Useful Post:
Posts: 98 | Thanked: 142 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#59
Not even pentaband 3G? That's a serious disappointment, and surprising especially coming from Nokia alum (who have historically been very good about having their unlocked phones be global 3G).
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Sazpaimon For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,298 | Thanked: 2,277 times | Joined on May 2011
#60
May be they tried to cut costs? Device is already overpriced for the average level of such hardware. Better modem could increase the price even more.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:02.