The Following User Says Thank You to aegis For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2013-12-19
, 15:00
|
Posts: 277 |
Thanked: 285 times |
Joined on Dec 2011
@ Poland
|
#12
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to szymeczek34 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-11-25
, 23:15
|
Posts: 54 |
Thanked: 54 times |
Joined on Dec 2013
@ Austria
|
#13
|
A big part of the N9/50 feeling slower after some time is the flash memory getting dirty.
Flashing solves this, but that's quite the dirty hack.
IIRC, while working on some block stuff for kernel-plus, I saw some stuff patched in for preliminary discard (TRIM) support - was never finished by Nokians.
That's pretty much the main cause of percieved slowdowns - pretty much no packages even bother to jump the hoops to autostart, that's a variable gone.
The Following User Says Thank You to Shadowdog For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-11-29
, 09:02
|
Posts: 47 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on Oct 2012
|
#14
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ridmaur For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
performance, review |
|
I presumed it was tracker database fragmentation as usually just deleting the twitter / mail dbs is enough but a reflash when I can be bothered works well too.