|
2015-06-09
, 23:11
|
Posts: 205 |
Thanked: 389 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#22
|
|
2015-06-11
, 05:52
|
Posts: 205 |
Thanked: 389 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#23
|
|
2015-06-16
, 01:53
|
Posts: 205 |
Thanked: 389 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#24
|
|
2015-06-16
, 05:53
|
Posts: 205 |
Thanked: 389 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#26
|
|
2015-06-16
, 06:14
|
Posts: 1,104 |
Thanked: 5,652 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Holland
|
#27
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to dirkvl For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-06-16
, 09:34
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#28
|
|
2015-06-20
, 22:37
|
Posts: 205 |
Thanked: 389 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#30
|
Or maybe its a good thing it didn't hit the target $30,000 limit.
Which to be honest, is unusually low. If it was $100,000 minimum it would make sense, but something like $300,000 to play with is more useful.
Even if it was real, and hit the target.... I'm not sure I would even pledge or buy one. Why? Simple... the outdated soc.
Its simply pushing lots of pixels using something that's as fast as the SGS3.
If lucky, the Tegra 3. And these were devices slow at 720p. This much pixels (and desktop programs) would push the soc to its limits most of the time, working in constant high voltage, it'd strain battery life hard.
Its an old processor, old gpu, old ram. No way around it.
They should’ve gone with 3GB RAM (for Ubuntu's sake).
And adopted a 2GHz Quad-A15 with 1.5GHz Quad-A7 SoC.
It's decent on battery life (LITTLE.big), and good performance in concurrent Octa-core mode.
There's some decent offerings form Allwinner, AMLogic, MediaTek and RockChip.
Just as long as they can provide the kernel source and drivers for Android (hence, Linux) it would be possible.
But that page was still good for a few lulz.
I'm flattered