The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Feathers McGraw For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-10-24
, 10:48
|
|
Posts: 645 |
Thanked: 519 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
@ Finland
|
#122
|
I am too lazy to check myself now. Is USB tethering enabled in the UI. I guess not?
![]() |
2015-10-24
, 12:54
|
|
Posts: 6,453 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#123
|
![]() |
2015-10-24
, 13:05
|
|
Posts: 6,453 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#124
|
Wouldn't you rather Jolla spend their precious development time working on the actual operating system instead of spending loads of time on one app?
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-10-24
, 14:03
|
|
Posts: 654 |
Thanked: 2,368 times |
Joined on Jul 2014
@ UK
|
#125
|
The browser is just one cog in a big machine, as is Phone, Messages, Email, Clock... Jolla itself reinforces that view by never offering updates to those packages separately, they always offer the whole thing as a monolithic block. So, to update the browser, they force me to reboot the phone. Even evil Microsoft does not do that.
![]() |
2015-10-24
, 14:25
|
|
Posts: 1,986 |
Thanked: 7,698 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Dayton, Ohio
|
#126
|
This is exactly the kind of arrogance that is the reason Open Source will never make a hole in the world.
There are certain standards my superiors expect from my work. I have every right to expect similar standards from from other people's work, Open Source or not.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Copernicus For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-10-24
, 14:52
|
Posts: 702 |
Thanked: 2,059 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ UK
|
#127
|
I don't understand the complaint. Sailfish ships with a reasonable browser, and even better browsers exist in the store, just like every other platform!
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to aegis For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-10-24
, 16:35
|
|
Posts: 1,197 |
Thanked: 2,710 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Hanoi
|
#128
|
I was a little blinded in my judgement by a new feature that is seen in the video. Upstarting native apps now shows the homescreen with "loading indicator" much quicker than before giving the impression of faster action. But the actual loading time of the apps is quite equal!
How i know? Well i fell in the well of "ClusterSSH" wich gave me the power to execute Sailfish app starts on three different devices simultaniously
stay tuned
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ste-phan For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-10-24
, 17:34
|
|
Community Council |
Posts: 1,669 |
Thanked: 10,227 times |
Joined on Nov 2014
@ Lower Rhine
|
#129
|
Somebody will ask if per preliminary measure you have cleaned up the btfrs file system in order to dress it up for optimal bench performance on each device but you know that I am certain
![]() |
2015-10-24
, 18:53
|
Posts: 1,548 |
Thanked: 7,510 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Czech Republic
|
#130
|
Jolla itself reinforces that view by never offering updates to those packages separately, they always offer the whole thing as a monolithic block. So, to update the browser, they force me to reboot the phone. Even evil Microsoft does not do that.
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to MartinK For This Useful Post: | ||
The Sailfish browser is "good enough" for most things, just like the AOSP browser is "good enough" for most things but not particularly awe inspiring. On every OS I can think of, one of the first things most people do is install a 3rd party browser to replace the built-in one. Like other platforms, the browser category has received a lot of 3rd party developer attention and we have WebPirate and WebCat to replace the default browser.
There's a double standard here too: Google development of the AOSP browser is minimal compared to Chrome because they want people to use Chrome instead, and improving the AOSP browser benefits all the other companies shipping custom Android distributions without Play services. I don't know why we expect Jolla to do so much work on their open browser when other companies don't.