Alternative history: What if Jolla never existed? - Page 22 - maemo.org

Active Topics

Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (3)
to SailfishOS by edp17 - 10 hrs ago
The N900 is now 15 years old! (6)
to Nokia N900 by Macros - 1 day, 14 hrs ago
F(x)tec Pro1x (QWERTY) for sale (0)
to Buy & Sell by aln00000 - 2 days, 2 hrs ago
n770 youtube video (0)
to General by nmdv - 6 days, 1 hr ago
more...

Page 22 of 28

Thread Tools

	Stskeeps	2015-11-24 , 15:46
	Posts: 1,671 \| Thanked: 11,478 times \| Joined on Jun 2008 @ Warsaw, Poland	#211

Originally Posted by aegis

The head? Surely that's the bottom.

How much are we decapitating here? Launcher replacements are ten a penny but no matter what nice ideas you see in launchers, you end up with Android apps and material design still rearing it's cheery but ultimately simplistic head.

How much of Android can we keep low down and still have a completely different UI?

http://pastie.org/10558283 or so.

And able to speak services like https://android.googlesource.com/pla...fiManager.aidl

Quote & Reply |

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post:
Copernicus, endsormeans, Feathers McGraw, itdoesntmatt, javispedro, juiceme, rcolistete, Venemo

MartinK	2015-11-24 , 15:57
Posts: 1,548 \| Thanked: 7,510 times \| Joined on Apr 2010 @ Czech Republic	#212

Originally Posted by javispedro

Reading the comments in https://blog.jolla.com/open-letter-jolla-community/ have just made me reaffirm myself in my position that it is stupid to try and go mass market. Thus "disrupting" anything should be out of the table.

I came to a similar observation. Also I'm afraid that the actual end result of the attempt to attack the mass market is something that does not appeal to either - its too unpolished and lacks too many features for the picky mass market while at the same it is too dumbed down, oversimplified and closed for the highly technical users.

BTW, even though technical users are definitely a minority, they are also a group that often provides advice to the less technical majority, can influence purchasing decisions in companies, are able to tolerate less stable but cutting edge software and can in many cases help with development.

Also targeting technical users should not be taken as a defeat - no one says you can't make the product (or its variant) accessible to wider audience once technical user helped to make it great.

__________________
modRana: a flexible GPS navigation system
Mieru: a flexible manga and comic book reader
Universal Components - a solution for native looking yet component set independent QML appliactions (QtQuick Controls 2 & Silica supported as backends)

Quote & Reply |

The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to MartinK For This Useful Post:
Bundyo, Copernicus, eekkelund, endsormeans, Feathers McGraw, itdoesntmatt, juiceme, minimos, mrsellout, rcolistete, salyavin, Venemo, wicket

	endsormeans	2015-11-24 , 16:03
	Posts: 3,141 \| Thanked: 8,161 times \| Joined on Feb 2013 @ From my Gabriola Island hermitage, near the Edge of the World	#213

Originally Posted by billranton

Yes, except in that case can't you use hybris to let you run glibc stuff too? You could basically decapitate Android, and replace the head with something more GNU like, package manager based.

A-HA!
Gnu-droid!
Speaking of heads and decapitation and Android ...
Put a gnu brain on that android body...
and what you'd have is a bloody unstoppable Hydra-droid-esque-monstrosity which you'd never be able to kill..
Sucker'd just grow more heads!

hehee
I'm all for an unstoppable-benign-juggernaut-of-an-os...
especially gnu-ey

Me.
All I want...is the ability to run as many different os's (preferably linux-ish) (and preferably rolling release ..too much to ask from Santa?

) and window managers on a handheld as possible....
that'll work decently of course ..

everything after that is just icing on the cake.
what's the adage?
"Heaven is options...Hell is one..or none..."
something like that.
It is simplistic.
I am grinding it down to fundamental basics...
but that was what originally lured me to the maemoan dark side way back when....

__________________
Lurker since 2007, Member since 2013, Certifiable since 1972

Owner of :
1-n770 (in retirement), 3-n800's / 3-n810's (still in daily use), 5-n900's ((3 are flawless, 1 loose usb ( parts), 1 has no telephony (parts))
3-nexus 5's : 1 w/ Floko Pie 9.1 (running beautifully) waiting for Stable Droid 10 rom, 1 w/ ̶Ubuntu Touch, 1 with Maru OS (intend maemo leste when ready)
1/2 - neo900 pre- "purchased" in 2013. N̶o̶w̶ ̶A̶w̶a̶i̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶r̶e̶f̶u̶n̶d̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶c̶e̶s̶s̶ ̶l̶a̶s̶t̶ ̶f̶e̶w̶ ̶y̶e̶a̶r̶s̶ - neo900 start up declared officially dead -
Lost invested funds.

PIMP MY N8X0 (Idiot's Guide and a video walkthrough)http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=94294
THE LOST GRONMAYER CATALOGShttp://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...ight=gronmayer
N8X0 VIDEO ENCODING THE EASY WAYhttp://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...ght=mediacoder
242gb ON N800http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=90634
THE PAIN-FREE MAEMO DEVELOPMENT LIVE DISTRO-ISO FOR THE NOOB TO THE PROhttp://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=95567
AFFORDABLE MASS PRODUCTION FOR MAEMO PARTShttp://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=93325

Meateo balloons now available @ Dave999's Meateo Emporium

Last edited by endsormeans; 2015-11-24 at 16:28.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to endsormeans For This Useful Post:
itdoesntmatt, juiceme, rcolistete, Venemo

	Venemo	2015-11-24 , 16:05
	Posts: 1,296 \| Thanked: 1,773 times \| Joined on Aug 2009 @ Budapest, Hungary	#214

Originally Posted by MartinK

BTW, even though technical users are definitely a minority, they [...] are able to tolerate less stable but cutting edge software [...]

Yes, to a certain extent. But tolerating bugs for two years that still haven't been fixed since 1.0.0 is really bad, even for technical users. At least for me, it's very irritating and makes me feel that it was a waste of time to test the stuff and report the bug.

__________________
You should follow me on Twitter!

Apps: Puzzle Master, IRC Chatter for Harmattan, IRC for Sailfish

Quote & Reply |

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Venemo For This Useful Post:
eekkelund, endsormeans, Feathers McGraw, itdoesntmatt, late88, Shadowdog, wicket, ZogG

MartinK	2015-11-24 , 16:57
Posts: 1,548 \| Thanked: 7,510 times \| Joined on Apr 2010 @ Czech Republic	#215

Originally Posted by Stskeeps

This might sound a bit heretic, but what if you could stuff your UX experience (reusing a bit of middleware, but not all the privacy invading **** and with no UX) on top of any Android hardware out there with less than 1 day worth of porting effort?

.. Except it would require not using a Mer-based (or for that matter any GNU/Linux) OS and leaving your favourite technologies behind, for the easier spreading.

That'd be a lot easier, wouldn't it?

What matters more? glibc/systemd; or control over the experiences that is the thing you actually touch; spread easily across the world to everybody?

I think this would certainly be an interesting project - sounds a but like an open source boot to Qt.

A big advantage would be certainly the relatively small amount of work needed to have something running and being able to basically run Qt apps on Android as first class citizens and without the Android bloat & spying crap. That sounds kinda like Firefox OS done right (Firefox OS does not use libhybris but basically gutted down Android with Firefox running fullscreen).

I can also imagine porting my apps to this platform as long as Python 3 is available as they & their deps already run on Android (after a substantial amount of work).

On the other hand I can also see some potential disadvantages and open questions:

If you want to do something Google is not interested in doing/supporting (or does not want you to do) you will be on your own and might need to write stuff from scratch that is easily possible on normal Linux distros.
Also any changes in the underlying Android base system might require to carry the resulting patches forever as Google would not be likely to merge them & to make them work with any changes Google does in the future.
Loosing control of your base system - Google dictates the direction of the platform and the project could not reasonably expect to change it, even if it is heading in a detrimental way. Also note that while this is highly unlikely, Android (minus kernel) is under BSD - Google could pull another Android 3 if it wanted (not releasing source or giving access only to partners).
Every non-android library you would want to use would need to be rebuild against Bionic - this is sometimes easy, but sometimes not trivial thing due to Bionic being a broken mess. So by default (until someone ports the needed libs) this means loosing any remaining compatibility with non-Qt based software.
If someone wanted to make this closer to "normal Linux" he would basically need to "unbreak" the system vs modifying normal Linux to be suitable for mobile devices. Still this could be eventually possible if the project is popular (eq. slowly replacing Android stuff and converging back to "normal" Linux).
What about multitasking and task switching/windowing ?
How would software distribution be handled ? - The existing Android packaging mechanisms probably could not be used.
Not normal but embedded Linux - which is a difference many seem to underestimate. (example: try to unpack a tar archive on a stock Android device, not to mention using ssh - good luck ).

Quote & Reply |

The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to MartinK For This Useful Post:
Copernicus, eekkelund, endsormeans, itdoesntmatt, javispedro, juiceme, minimos, mrsellout, nodevel, rcolistete, smoku, wicket

	daperl	2015-11-24 , 17:23
	Posts: 2,427 \| Thanked: 2,986 times \| Joined on Dec 2007	#216

Originally Posted by Venemo

To be honest, smarphones and tablets are already very boring. Wouldn't it be more interesting to come up with “the next big thing” instead?

Well, maybe we should get smartphones right before we move on. The n900 was a great start, but then the iOS meme spread like a virus and here we are today. We need to back up and go down the other path. The path where the device was a computer with cell phone capabilities.

I don't wear or want a watch. I don't want a Google Star Trek communicator on my shirt. I wear cargo pants and cargo shorts so I can carry around a computer.

Originally Posted by Stskeeps

This might sound a bit heretic, but what if you could stuff your UX experience (reusing a bit of middleware, but not all the privacy invading **** and with no UX) on top of any Android hardware out there with less than 1 day worth of porting effort?

Sounds great. An unlocked Galaxy Note 4 could be the development target device. In pink of course.

__________________
N9: Go white or go home

Quote & Reply |

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post:
Copernicus, endsormeans, jimmy neutron, juiceme, marxian, minimos, rcolistete, salyavin, wicket

itdoesntmatt	2015-11-24 , 17:37
Posts: 529 \| Thanked: 988 times \| Joined on Mar 2015	#217

Originally Posted by Venemo

I have no idea. Had I known, I'd already be filthy rich.

However... what happened to the concept of a mobile computer? That the N95 and later the N900 tried to be?

sorry for my stupid consideration but why is so wanted from you? You have mini pc, you can have tablet, 2 in 1, why would i need a smartphone to use it as a pc? (with its little battery). you would need also a keyboard, a monitor, so what?

Last edited by itdoesntmatt; 2015-11-24 at 17:58.

Quote & Reply |

	Copernicus	2015-11-24 , 17:55
	Posts: 1,986 \| Thanked: 7,698 times \| Joined on Dec 2010 @ Dayton, Ohio	#218

Originally Posted by itdoesntmatt

what sorry for my stupid consideration but why is so wanted from you? You have mini pc, you can have tablet, 2 in 1, why would i need a smartphone to use it as a pc? (with its little battery). you would need also a keyboard, a monitor, so what?

I want it. I like the idea of working at my desktop, then disconnecting a pocketable mobile device from it and continuing my work as I go.

The concept of a mobile device that works differently than your desktop, that you "sync" to your desktop when you leave and return, was created (and perfected!) with the PDAs back in the 90's. All we've really got today with the smartphone world are PDAs that are also good media players...

Quote & Reply |

The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Copernicus For This Useful Post:
billranton, Casanunda, Feathers McGraw, javispedro, juiceme, pichlo, rcolistete, salyavin, smoku, wicket

itdoesntmatt	2015-11-24 , 18:00
Posts: 529 \| Thanked: 988 times \| Joined on Mar 2015	#219

Originally Posted by Copernicus

I want it. I like the idea of working at my desktop, then disconnecting a pocketable mobile device from it and continuing my work as I go.

The concept of a mobile device that works differently than your desktop, that you "sync" to your desktop when you leave and return, was created (and perfected!) with the PDAs back in the 90's. All we've really got today with the smartphone world are PDAs that are also good media players...

you simply want continuum from microsoft but in an open source form? i don't feel the utility, but is only my opinion. i don't think i would work even when i am walking to go somewhere. could be useful for some cases, but not for most, i believe.

Quote & Reply |

	pichlo	2015-11-24 , 18:18
	Posts: 6,447 \| Thanked: 20,981 times \| Joined on Sep 2012 @ UK	#220

Originally Posted by Copernicus

I want it. I like the idea of working at my desktop, then disconnecting a pocketable mobile device from it and continuing my work as I go.

The concept of a mobile device that works differently than your desktop, that you "sync" to your desktop when you leave and return, was created (and perfected!) with the PDAs back in the 90's...

...and then forgotten. The last device I owned that fulfilled that function perfectly was my Palm Treo 600.

__________________
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!