piggz
|
2016-04-07
, 21:11
|
Posts: 213 |
Thanked: 414 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#221
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to piggz For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-07
, 21:34
|
Posts: 287 |
Thanked: 862 times |
Joined on Dec 2015
|
#222
|
Yes, however gears have separate limits, so even if it compiles, it doesn't mean runtime is fine. Just to be sure it's really rockpool-specific(maybe for the certain platform) problem.
Speaking about the platform. Can you estimate from the top of your head protocol-level changes btw pebbled(2.x) and rockworkd(3.x) implementation? I'm just thinking whether ios/android could be falling back to older proto when speaking to aplite for certain transfer types. Which may lead to nacks for pure 3.x comm.
|
2016-04-08
, 05:09
|
|
Posts: 4,708 |
Thanked: 4,649 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Bulgaria
|
#223
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bundyo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-08
, 05:22
|
Posts: 287 |
Thanked: 862 times |
Joined on Dec 2015
|
#224
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to abranson For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-08
, 06:34
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 482 times |
Joined on Mar 2016
|
#225
|
Afaik the appmessage protocol is identical in v2 and v3. The code is pretty much identical between rockwork/rockpool and pebbled.
The Following User Says Thank You to ruff For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-08
, 06:57
|
Posts: 287 |
Thanked: 862 times |
Joined on Dec 2015
|
#226
|
Ok, then we need logs from watches to understand why it's nacking appmsg. The message is fairly simple - simple scalar value, nothing what could potentially be wrongly serialized.
Does anyone have annotated firmware disassembly accidentally? To look for possible reasons to nack.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to abranson For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-08
, 07:57
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 482 times |
Joined on Mar 2016
|
#227
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ruff For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-08
, 08:06
|
Posts: 287 |
Thanked: 862 times |
Joined on Dec 2015
|
#228
|
The Following User Says Thank You to abranson For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-08
, 08:19
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 482 times |
Joined on Mar 2016
|
#229
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ruff For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-04-08
, 08:23
|
Posts: 287 |
Thanked: 862 times |
Joined on Dec 2015
|
#230
|
The Following User Says Thank You to abranson For This Useful Post: | ||