Active Topics
-
Firefox with Leste (10)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 3 days, 6 hrs ago - more...
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to fw190 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2016-05-05
, 14:13
|
|
Posts: 479 |
Thanked: 1,284 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ Enschede, The Netherlands
|
#22
|
Originally Posted by fw190
Sounds vaguely familiar, doesn't it?
This is why we plan to open the source code of UnaOS in the future.
Also, "open source" isn't all what's needed. Open protocols and the possibility to run your own servers, preferably in a federated way, are imo even more important.
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Fuzzillogic For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2016-05-05
, 16:27
|
|
Posts: 764 |
Thanked: 2,888 times |
Joined on Jun 2014
|
#23
|
Originally Posted by Fuzzillogic
Additionally, https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-...-point.en.html
Sounds vaguely familiar, doesn't it?
Also, "open source" isn't all what's needed. Open protocols and the possibility to run your own servers, preferably in a federated way, are imo even more important.
| The Following User Says Thank You to nthn For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2016-05-05
, 16:30
|
|
Posts: 584 |
Thanked: 700 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#24
|
Originally Posted by Fuzzillogic
You are right but maybe you could ask them about it?
Sounds vaguely familiar, doesn't it?
Also, "open source" isn't all what's needed. Open protocols and the possibility to run your own servers, preferably in a federated way, are imo even more important.
Maybe this is what they mean with their statement and maybe not.
__________________
per ardua ad astra
per ardua ad astra
| The Following User Says Thank You to fw190 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2016-05-05
, 22:04
|
|
Posts: 84 |
Thanked: 146 times |
Joined on Feb 2015
|
#25
|
Hmm. USB-C? Fingerprint sensor?
An Android variant on which you cannot install anything rendering the device a dumb phone? In this case, why even bother with Android? Why not write a gui for BSD and run that instead? Oh, right, proprietary hardware drivers based on closed sores, the same issue Jolla has.
A locked bootloader so that you cannot remedy your mistake purchase and at least have a device you can play games on or use as car navigation?
Why the heck would anyone spend money on this unless they have no idea what real security is and want to feel good about their ignorance?
This is either brilliant marketing or a statement on how dumb most users are.
An Android variant on which you cannot install anything rendering the device a dumb phone? In this case, why even bother with Android? Why not write a gui for BSD and run that instead? Oh, right, proprietary hardware drivers based on closed sores, the same issue Jolla has.
A locked bootloader so that you cannot remedy your mistake purchase and at least have a device you can play games on or use as car navigation?
Why the heck would anyone spend money on this unless they have no idea what real security is and want to feel good about their ignorance?
This is either brilliant marketing or a statement on how dumb most users are.
|
|
2016-05-06
, 07:24
|
|
Posts: 584 |
Thanked: 700 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#26
|
So what secure phone do you propose?
And don't write that security is not possible on a phone due to sim etc. - we all know that, we know about the closed source blobs, insecurity bla bla bla. We live in a world in which a phone is a standard tool so the bottom linen is:
What is your security pick?
And don't write that security is not possible on a phone due to sim etc. - we all know that, we know about the closed source blobs, insecurity bla bla bla. We live in a world in which a phone is a standard tool so the bottom linen is:
What is your security pick?
__________________
per ardua ad astra
per ardua ad astra
|
|
2016-05-06
, 17:00
|
|
Posts: 187 |
Thanked: 514 times |
Joined on Nov 2014
|
#28
|
An amnesiac phone? Re-importing your contacts, reinstalling all applications, losing message history etc. etc., every time you boot doesn't sound like fun to me...
I'll stick with 'secure-ish' I think
I'll stick with 'secure-ish' I think
 |
|
2016-05-07
, 00:33
|
|
Posts: 1,196 |
Thanked: 2,708 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Hanoi
|
#30
|
Originally Posted by MikeHG
I see what you mean but I could read all relevant information even without allowing unaos.com in noscript.
Their site doesn't do anything unless I disable noscript.
Probably more a sign of the times than of hypocrisy, but still amusing if you're easily amused...
https://unaos.com/
For me this looks like this company is planning some serious system administration work on Android. About time?
Networks and system integrators still get paid for selling just "another Windows" computer with enhanced security customization.
Why not pay for enhanced security if the job is well done?
Just out of interest, could the security experts here confirm that with a budget of ~USD 250 they can make any random Android phone secure on all levels this one Unaos claims to be secure? Short list of tools to install?
Not being into Android, I would possibly buy this if it does mostly everything I need out of the box. For that reason I still like my Symbian and my Maemo.
Edit: type error question : why not
Last edited by ste-phan; 2016-05-07 at 14:18.
per ardua ad astra