The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to chenliangchen For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-08-16
, 21:30
|
Posts: 509 |
Thanked: 626 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
@ Mexico/Germany
|
#12
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to chilango For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-08-17
, 06:45
|
Posts: 204 |
Thanked: 619 times |
Joined on May 2015
|
#13
|
No. Read the report history.
Symbian was limited en Touch. And Nokia had the Alternitiv Maemo/Meego.
The Problem was that Symbian Division was fighting and nobody with balls, made the decision what is the future.
Loved the E71 with Symbian, it was the best. Encryption, SIP, VPN - all integrated in the OS.
Interested in the E7 but finally buyed the N9 (never had see the N900 in Mexiko).
Maemo/Meego was the evolution but never it received a GO from the board.
The Following User Says Thank You to ka9yhd For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-08-17
, 07:22
|
|
Posts: 943 |
Thanked: 3,229 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Zagreb
|
#14
|
No. Read the report history.
Symbian was limited en Touch. And Nokia had the Alternitiv Maemo/Meego.
The Problem was that Symbian Division was fighting and nobody with balls, made the decision what is the future.
Loved the E71 with Symbian, it was the best. Encryption, SIP, VPN - all integrated in the OS.
Interested in the E7 but finally buyed the N9 (never had see the N900 in Mexiko).
Maemo/Meego was the evolution but never it received a GO from the board.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to kinggo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-08-17
, 07:34
|
|
Posts: 1,478 |
Thanked: 9,871 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
@ Shanghai / London
|
#15
|
![]() |
2016-08-17
, 10:35
|
Posts: 592 |
Thanked: 1,167 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
|
#16
|
Their Board of Director did, no body/nothing else.
Symbian was a bit obsolete, but it is a good OS. (Compared with something like Windows), real multitasking, efficient, light weight. If Nokia put some decent HW on it, instead of 640x360 all the time, it will have a second chance.
It's Nokia killed themselves, Not Symbian, Not Elop, Not Windows.
![]() |
2016-08-17
, 13:42
|
Posts: 1,269 |
Thanked: 3,961 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Brazil
|
#17
|
No. Read the report history.
Symbian was limited en Touch. And Nokia had the Alternitiv Maemo/Meego.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to rcolistete For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-08-18
, 07:54
|
Posts: 337 |
Thanked: 891 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
@ Royaume Uni.
|
#18
|
![]() |
2016-08-18
, 07:55
|
|
Posts: 6,453 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#19
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2016-08-18
, 16:02
|
Posts: 649 |
Thanked: 762 times |
Joined on Mar 2012
@ Ohio
|
#20
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to imaginaryenemy For This Useful Post: | ||
Symbian was a bit obsolete, but it is a good OS. (Compared with something like Windows), real multitasking, efficient, light weight. If Nokia put some decent HW on it, instead of 640x360 all the time, it will have a second chance.
It's Nokia killed themselves, Not Symbian, Not Elop, Not Windows.