|
2017-09-26
, 16:01
|
|
Posts: 654 |
Thanked: 2,368 times |
Joined on Jul 2014
@ UK
|
#1092
|
|
2017-09-26
, 19:39
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#1093
|
I think he means it got used for SW development, and not for HW costs.
I think what went on was:
- IGG campaign raised money
- part of it was spent on development, as promised
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-09-26
, 20:00
|
|
Posts: 7,075 |
Thanked: 9,073 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#1094
|
I would love to get my hands on a Latsu case when the Youyota tablet ships, but I should think that they have been recycled or thrown out long ago. Storage costs money, and I seriously doubt that either Latsu or Jolla would have been prepared to pay anything to keep them out of the rubbish skip once the tablet campaign failed.
You never know though, maybe there are a few hundred in a corner of a storage room somewhere that have been forgotten about. If someone is prepared to do a bit of detective work and track them down, they could be used to offset part of the second round of tablet refunds for original backers who get a Youyota tablet.
|
2017-09-26
, 21:15
|
Posts: 301 |
Thanked: 531 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ The Netherlands
|
#1095
|
Where did you get that from? Any secret sources? (It might have been of course, but that's either some secret information from Jolla - or speculation.)
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to rob_kouw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-10-01
, 13:09
|
Posts: 466 |
Thanked: 335 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#1096
|
The problem is, that we all want Sailfish OS to be a success. Jolla company is kind of "second hand priority".
Personally I would give blood to get SFOS on a decent hardware unit, but I wouldn't give **** to save Jolla company.
|
2017-10-03
, 19:40
|
Posts: 248 |
Thanked: 1,142 times |
Joined on Dec 2014
@ Earth
|
#1097
|
Do you honestly believe that SFOS can survive without Jolla?
If Jolla goes under, SF might not go under immediately, but it will fall so far behind in development that it can't stand a Chance against Corporate solutions anymore.
|
2017-10-03
, 19:53
|
Posts: 1,548 |
Thanked: 7,510 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Czech Republic
|
#1098
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to MartinK For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-10-03
, 20:26
|
Posts: 592 |
Thanked: 1,167 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
|
#1099
|
The only reason Sailfish OS is still viable is :
- because there are paid-for developpers at Jolla working on it
- and there's some money (from investor, from partners and carriers, from crowdsourcing and end-users) flowing to Jolla to paid said developers.
|
2017-10-03
, 21:42
|
Posts: 204 |
Thanked: 619 times |
Joined on May 2015
|
#1100
|
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to ka9yhd For This Useful Post: | ||
Amboss, coley, Feathers McGraw, jakibaki, Jordi, juiceme, JulmaHerra, lutz, mariusmssj, MartinK, olf, pacman, pichlo, rob_kouw |
Tags |
jolla tablet, sailfish os |
|
I'd say that's highly unlikely because the total cost of the tablet project was much higher than the amount of money raised via IGG.
So it was like: In the end, they had 2 bathtubs filled with coins. That's what the project cost them.
The money from IGG was enough to fill the first tub. For the second tub, they had to use coins for their own pockets (or rather, their inverstors').
So at which point would money from IGG have been mixed up with other business? (Which business, btw? They don't own a bakery or such.) Even if one of the IGG coins for some reason ended up in Jolla's general budget, that's exactly the budget they used for filling up the second tub.