The Following User Says Thank You to sulu For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2019-09-17
, 23:21
|
|
Posts: 868 |
Thanked: 2,516 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
@ Germany
|
#22
|
route add default gw 10.6.6.6
The Following User Says Thank You to Halftux For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2019-09-18
, 06:44
|
Posts: 915 |
Thanked: 3,209 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Germany
|
#23
|
Yes you need to set the default gw on your PC.
Code:route add default gw 10.6.6.6
And check on PC your /etc/resolv.conf
should be
139.7.30.126
139.7.30.125
# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 gprs0 # iptables --list Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination
# uname -a Linux n900main 2.6.28.10-power53 #1 PREEMPT Wed Dec 10 13:52:39 UTC 2014 armv7l GNU/Linux
|
2019-09-18
, 07:38
|
|
Posts: 1,718 |
Thanked: 4,764 times |
Joined on Apr 2018
@ Helsinki, Finland.
|
#24
|
|
2019-09-18
, 09:53
|
|
Posts: 868 |
Thanked: 2,516 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
@ Germany
|
#25
|
I seem to have a lot of interference here though. Whenever I try to transmit data via gprs, my DSL internet connection seems to hickup and gprs data transmission also doesn't always seem to work here. Then it usually helps to switch back and forth between 2.5G and 3G on the N900.
Especially if someone opens the door of my tenement, that seems to disturb gprs transmission. I also noticed that effect in the past, when I was watching TV via DVB-T.
|
2019-09-18
, 14:01
|
|
Posts: 868 |
Thanked: 2,516 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
@ Germany
|
#26
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Halftux For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2019-09-18
, 16:39
|
Posts: 915 |
Thanked: 3,209 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Germany
|
#27
|
Hmm sounds strange I would change the apartment. Wifi can interfere with BT. But gprs hmm to much metal and concrete.
The other thing about bt pan. You can't get a dhcp reply because the N900 will not bring up bnep0. I found in another thread that it could be fixed by reinstalling libicd2.
defaultroute replacedefaultroute
The Following User Says Thank You to sulu For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2019-09-18
, 18:38
|
|
Posts: 868 |
Thanked: 2,516 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
@ Germany
|
#28
|
deb http://maemo.muarf.org/apt-mirror/mirror/downloads.maemo.nokia.com/fremantle/ssu/mr0 ./
For the wvdial solution I've found a way to automate the routing. [1]
If I add these options to /etc/ppp/peers/wvdial, the route will be set automatically when wvdial is started:
Code:defaultroute replacedefaultroute
The Following User Says Thank You to Halftux For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2019-09-18
, 19:09
|
Community Council |
Posts: 685 |
Thanked: 1,234 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Mbabane
|
#29
|
|
2019-09-19
, 06:50
|
Posts: 915 |
Thanked: 3,209 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Germany
|
#30
|
Thanks for your efforts with the btpan app! Unfortunately it doesn't change my outcome.
In Debian I have the packages installed and the N900 is paired with my PC. Then I run btpan on the N900 and see a window popping up with this line in it:
In the meantime I've tried to resurrect my old wvdial DUN connection and got a but further but wasn't totally successful.
(fyi, what I'm about to write now is a translation of a post I just wrote at debianforum.de. [1] So If your German is better than your (or my) English it's probably best to read the original.)
My /etc/wvdial.conf:
Somewhere I picked up that route might help me, but it sems I already have the correct route (10.6.6.6)?:
[1] https://debianforum.de/forum/viewtop...74706#p1217285