Active Topics
-
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (3)
to SailfishOS by edp17 - 6 hrs, 47 mins ago -
The N900 is now 15 years old! (6)
to Nokia N900 by Macros - 1 day, 10 hrs ago -
F(x)tec Pro1x (QWERTY) for sale (0)
to Buy & Sell by aln00000 - 1 day, 23 hrs ago -
n770 youtube video (0)
to General by nmdv - 5 days, 22 hrs ago - more...
 |
n900user259 |
2020-11-30
, 14:11
|
|
Posts: 155 |
Thanked: 309 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ The Netherlands
|
#71
|
It's here. Ubuntu touch for the Fxtec Pro1: https://devices.ubuntu-touch.io/device/pro1/
|
|
2020-12-02
, 09:24
|
|
Posts: 155 |
Thanked: 309 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ The Netherlands
|
#72
|
So, I'm having a bit of trouble getting ubuntu touch on my phone.
I won't bother you with the entire proces but what it comes down to is that when the flashing is started by the installer the phone prompts the startup screen with a very small message (that starts somewhere offscreen!) to "press any key to shutdown".
I've tried it manually, startup the bootloader and then connect it to USB.
The result is the same. The bootloader is exited and the startup screen is shown with this message.
ADB shows the device is connected.
However when I try adb reboot bootloader the same thing happens.
I've already tried a factory reset but it's still the same.
Has anybody else ever seen a similar problem?
I won't bother you with the entire proces but what it comes down to is that when the flashing is started by the installer the phone prompts the startup screen with a very small message (that starts somewhere offscreen!) to "press any key to shutdown".
I've tried it manually, startup the bootloader and then connect it to USB.
The result is the same. The bootloader is exited and the startup screen is shown with this message.
ADB shows the device is connected.
However when I try adb reboot bootloader the same thing happens.
I've already tried a factory reset but it's still the same.
Has anybody else ever seen a similar problem?
|
|
2020-12-02
, 10:18
|
|
Posts: 1,335 |
Thanked: 3,931 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Brittany, France
|
#73
|
That's weird, I haven't had such issue. Here's what I did (from the top of my head):
- Download the Appimage installer
- Install fastboot (in the package "android-tools" on my distribution)
- chmod +x the Appimage file, execute it
- In the installer, say yes when prompted for the first time to set udev rules; if not prompted, it's in one of the menus
- Reboot my Pro1 in bootloader mode (Vol Down + Power), plug it to USB
- In the installer, select manually the device I wanted (but automatic detection worked too if I remember correctly, it just took a little bit longer before the device was detected)
- Follow instructions: there are several steps where the installer asks you to reboot in bootloader (already done) and then press a button on the installer to continue, then boot into recovery mode and confirm, something like that
It worked well for me and I did it three times. The only time it didn't was because I had fastboot installed from snap instead of regular package manager, so it was not in my $PATH and udev rules were not set.
Also, I flashed from Sailfish but I recommend you flash from an updated Android reset package instead (the last one is from August 2020, see link in my TWRP guide) because there are some partitions that are not written by the installer and that instead reuse what was written when flashing Android in the first place. It would work still, but some features would be missing depending on how old is the image your flashed into your vendor partition. Normally, it should be enough to just flash vendor.img without reflashing Android (no data loss), this is what I did and I can confirm it fixed the missing features I observed previously. However, I am still having an issue with the fingerprints that looks very similar to one I once had in Sailfish, which suggests again a partition that is not overwritten during the flash and instead reuses what Android flashing procedure wrote in the first place, so maybe there is something else I should flash. That's why, if you're not concerned about data loss, you should avoid these potential issues if you flash Ubuntu onto a recent Android factory package.
- Download the Appimage installer
- Install fastboot (in the package "android-tools" on my distribution)
- chmod +x the Appimage file, execute it
- In the installer, say yes when prompted for the first time to set udev rules; if not prompted, it's in one of the menus
- Reboot my Pro1 in bootloader mode (Vol Down + Power), plug it to USB
- In the installer, select manually the device I wanted (but automatic detection worked too if I remember correctly, it just took a little bit longer before the device was detected)
- Follow instructions: there are several steps where the installer asks you to reboot in bootloader (already done) and then press a button on the installer to continue, then boot into recovery mode and confirm, something like that
It worked well for me and I did it three times. The only time it didn't was because I had fastboot installed from snap instead of regular package manager, so it was not in my $PATH and udev rules were not set.
Also, I flashed from Sailfish but I recommend you flash from an updated Android reset package instead (the last one is from August 2020, see link in my TWRP guide) because there are some partitions that are not written by the installer and that instead reuse what was written when flashing Android in the first place. It would work still, but some features would be missing depending on how old is the image your flashed into your vendor partition. Normally, it should be enough to just flash vendor.img without reflashing Android (no data loss), this is what I did and I can confirm it fixed the missing features I observed previously. However, I am still having an issue with the fingerprints that looks very similar to one I once had in Sailfish, which suggests again a partition that is not overwritten during the flash and instead reuses what Android flashing procedure wrote in the first place, so maybe there is something else I should flash. That's why, if you're not concerned about data loss, you should avoid these potential issues if you flash Ubuntu onto a recent Android factory package.
 |
|
2020-12-02
, 10:29
|
|
Posts: 1,718 |
Thanked: 4,764 times |
Joined on Apr 2018
@ Helsinki, Finland.
|
#74
|
Have you informed about these finds?
__________________
"I don't know how but I can try!" (active)
Master of not knowing (active)
For me it is possible to get lost in any case (active)
Learning to fall from high (DONE)
Learning to code with BASIC (WIP)
"I don't know how but I can try!" (active)
Master of not knowing (active)
For me it is possible to get lost in any case (active)
Learning to fall from high (DONE)
Learning to code with BASIC (WIP)
|
|
2020-12-02
, 11:16
|
|
Posts: 155 |
Thanked: 309 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ The Netherlands
|
#75
|
@Kabouik, Looking at your steps it goes wrong on step 5 when I connect it to USB. I'm on windows by the way. I already flashed Sailfish on it several weeks ago and went back to Android to try out the flashing proces.
Does your bootloader menu show any versions?
Because mine doesn't. It does show the rest. Product_name (msm8998), variant (MSM UFS), serial number, secure boot (no) and device state (unlocked).
Did I mention that the LED is red when connected to USB?
Last edited by n900user259; 2020-12-02 at 11:49.
Does your bootloader menu show any versions?
Because mine doesn't. It does show the rest. Product_name (msm8998), variant (MSM UFS), serial number, secure boot (no) and device state (unlocked).
Did I mention that the LED is red when connected to USB?
Last edited by n900user259; 2020-12-02 at 11:49.
 |
|
2020-12-02
, 11:32
|
|
Posts: 4,708 |
Thanked: 4,649 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Bulgaria
|
#76
|
Make sure you use an USB2 port - USB3 sometimes has problems with flashing. I guess you already have drivers, since you flashed before.
__________________
Technically, there are three determinate states the cat could be in: Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Technically, there are three determinate states the cat could be in: Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Bundyo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2020-12-02
, 13:15
|
|
Posts: 155 |
Thanked: 309 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ The Netherlands
|
#77
|
@Bundyo, THANKS!
It was the USB3 port messing with fastboot.
@Kabouik, I want to follow your recommendation in flashing from a more recent Android reset package but looking at your TWRP page it contains 16 files to flash but the .7z archive you linked contains 24.
Also running the fastboot_all.bat is weird.
First the newly added userdata.img failed to flash:
Second both system.img and vendor.img are commented out:
This is confusing.
It was the USB3 port messing with fastboot.
@Kabouik, I want to follow your recommendation in flashing from a more recent Android reset package but looking at your TWRP page it contains 16 files to flash but the .7z archive you linked contains 24.
Also running the fastboot_all.bat is weird.
First the newly added userdata.img failed to flash:
Code:
fastboot flash userdata.img unknown partition 'userdata.img' fastboot: error: cannot determine image filename for 'userdata.img'
Code:
rem fastboot flash system_a system.img rem fastboot flash system_b system.img rem fastboot flash vendor_a vendor.img rem fastboot flash vendor_b vendor.img
|
|
2020-12-02
, 13:19
|
|
Posts: 90 |
Thanked: 580 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Belgium
|
#78
|
Originally Posted by n900user259
The correct command would be
First the newly added userdata.img failed to flash:
Code:fastboot flash userdata.img unknown partition 'userdata.img' fastboot: error: cannot determine image filename for 'userdata.img'
Code:
fastboot flash userdata userdata.img
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to netman For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2020-12-02
, 13:35
|
|
Posts: 155 |
Thanked: 309 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ The Netherlands
|
#79
|
Originally Posted by netman
That would also be my guess.
The correct command would bei think.Code:fastboot flash userdata userdata.img
Also system.img and vendor.img shouldn't commented out because what would be the point?
|
|
2020-12-02
, 14:20
|
|
Posts: 155 |
Thanked: 309 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ The Netherlands
|
#80
|
I created a post about this on the fxtec community forum.
See: https://community.fxtec.com/topic/24...&comment=54691
See: https://community.fxtec.com/topic/24...&comment=54691
