Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (7)
to Nokia N900 by Danct12 - 3 days, 7 hrs ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 4 days, 3 hrs ago -
F(x)tec Pro1x (QWERTY) for sale (0)
to Buy & Sell by aln00000 - 6 days, 12 hrs ago - more...
 |
|
2023-03-31
, 09:14
|
|
Posts: 584 |
Thanked: 1,550 times |
Joined on Sep 2019
|
#2
|
I don't know any Linux distro that follows kernel versioning like that.
Since kernel development happens independently of distro development, that would put unnecessary pressure on distro devs.
I also seem to remember that Torvalds said that the decision to up the major version number is more or less arbitrary.
Since kernel development happens independently of distro development, that would put unnecessary pressure on distro devs.
I also seem to remember that Torvalds said that the decision to up the major version number is more or less arbitrary.
| The Following User Says Thank You to nonsuch For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2023-03-31
, 15:06
|
|
Posts: 501 |
Thanked: 619 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#3
|
Originally Posted by nonsuch
Many Linux distros has some reason why it is not numbered like that. But Maemo doesn't have any reason why not right now.
I don't know any Linux distro that follows kernel versioning like that.
Originally Posted by nonsuch
Actually it doesn't give any pressure at all. They can skip numbers or add RC2 or SP2 or .01 or something to version number or skip some version numbers if needed.
Since kernel development happens independently of distro development, that would put unnecessary pressure on distro devs.
Originally Posted by nonsuch
That is true, but major and minor version number go bigger any way. So why not synchronize Maemo version numbering to that at least from 6.1 to some version that not possible. What would be reason that it had to stop?
I also seem to remember that Torvalds said that the decision to up the major version number is more or less arbitrary.
|
|
2023-03-31
, 19:23
|
|
Posts: 175 |
Thanked: 210 times |
Joined on Mar 2013
|
#4
|
Originally Posted by teroyk
Maemo is ready for daily use? LTS version?
So would it be good that Maemo 6.1 should be first LTS version?
That's nice
On which device? PinePhone Pro?
|
|
2023-04-05
, 08:20
|
|
Posts: 501 |
Thanked: 619 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#5
|
Originally Posted by Malakai
It is now more like 6.1 Developer Preview version, but there can be path to up to LTS.
Maemo is ready for daily use? LTS version?
Originally Posted by Malakai
Pinephone Pro is not supported at all, but on Pinephone and Droid 4 works quite well.
On which device? PinePhone Pro?
| The Following User Says Thank You to teroyk For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2024-10-16
, 11:03
|
|
Posts: 501 |
Thanked: 619 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#6
|
Kernel version in stable image is still 6.1.15 is there coming version 6.6 anytime soon?
|
|
2024-10-16
, 12:53
|
|
Posts: 87 |
Thanked: 101 times |
Joined on Jul 2023
@ Europe
|
#7
|
6.6 LTS is already there for a while: you just need to dist-upgrade to -devel.
'Stable' images are not 'ready to use' at the moment and the last ones seem broken. It is better to use older ones (and upgrade to devel).
Leste is near beta with last devel upgrade in my opinion, even on N900.
Unstable dev stuff is in -experimental branch.
'Stable' images are not 'ready to use' at the moment and the last ones seem broken. It is better to use older ones (and upgrade to devel).
Leste is near beta with last devel upgrade in my opinion, even on N900.
Unstable dev stuff is in -experimental branch.
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Arno_11 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2024-10-20
, 12:53
|
|
Posts: 501 |
Thanked: 619 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#8
|
After latest updates my stable 6.1 installation is quite good for every day use. I might wait stable 6.6 sdcard-image release.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to teroyk For This Useful Post: | ||
So would it be good that Maemo 6.1 should be first LTS version?
What you think about that Maemo version numbering?