|
2008-03-27
, 00:00
|
Posts: 48 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Chicago, IL
|
#2
|
|
2008-03-27
, 00:05
|
Posts: 67 |
Thanked: 17 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
|
#3
|
|
2008-03-27
, 00:09
|
|
Posts: 177 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Phoenix
|
#4
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Wes Doobner For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-03-27
, 00:22
|
Posts: 751 |
Thanked: 522 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ East Gowanus
|
#5
|
|
2008-03-27
, 00:28
|
|
Posts: 276 |
Thanked: 74 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Missouri, USA
|
#6
|
|
2008-03-27
, 00:29
|
Posts: 1,950 |
Thanked: 1,174 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Seattle, USA
|
#7
|
|
2008-03-27
, 01:02
|
Posts: 133 |
Thanked: 20 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Mexico
|
#8
|
|
2008-03-27
, 01:10
|
|
Posts: 187 |
Thanked: 77 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#9
|
|
2008-03-27
, 02:37
|
|
Posts: 123 |
Thanked: 35 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ South Bend, Indiana
|
#10
|
I don't understand how the ipod touch is such a competitor to the tablets...They're two totally different devices for two totally different audiences. They are both excellent devices, but in different ways.
The Following User Says Thank You to spartanNTX For This Useful Post: | ||
For those of you who may be borderline each device, maybe I can help you choose through my experiences with both. Lets go over the main differences:
N810 - aprox. $380
- 2GB of Internal Memory (MiniSD slot for expandable storage)
- Bluetooth
- GPS
- Camera
- Hardware Keyboard
- 800x480 4.5" passive touch screen
iPod Touch - $299(8GB), $399(16GB), $499(32GB)- 8/16/32GB of Internal Memory based on the model (mine is 16GB)
- 480x320 3.5" active touch screen (also called capacitive touch)
I really enjoyed my N810 after it arrived around Christmas time. I thought it was the end-all-be-all device for a mobile user. The hardware is great (for the most part), but its the software that really brings the device down. A few things that really upset me on the N810 was really bad horizontal and vertical tearing when things were moving on the screen. This was apparently caused by the screen not refreshing at the correct rate. The OS on the N810 (OS2008) couldn't decide whether it wanted to be designed for the stylus, or designed for finger input (more on that in this thread), what usually ended up happening is that you would have to hold the stylus between your fingers while you used the keyboard, then hit something on the screen with your finger, then come to another menu that is so small that you have to use the stylus. Having to use all these methods of input at once is really not conducive to a good user experience.Most people who own an N810 will tell you that the camera and GPS may as well not even be included on the N810. The camera is very low quality, such that it is barely even acceptable for video chatting. For most users, the N810's GPS had a very hard time locking on, it would usually take upwards of 10 minutes for me, but once it got a lock it generally held fairly well. The "Maps" app that comes on the N810 is a skeleton that you will have to pay a $130 for the full application to use it for the next 3 years. Luckily for those of us who didn't expect to pay $130 more for our N810s than we originally thought, there is Maemo Mapper, a well made application that will work with the N810's GPS. The only problem with Maemo Mapper is that it doesn't have a local route processing, which means that unless you have an internet connection, can can't set up directions, you have to do that ahead of time.
I decided to get the N810 over the iPod Touch the first time around for things like the increased screen resolution, the Bluetooth, GPS, camera, and hardware keyboard. Let me share my thoughts on those - I was one of the people that was almost disgusted at the iPod Touch's tiny 480x320 screen, I thought I was much better off with the N810's 800x480 screen. You might not think so at first, but having an effective way to quickly zoom in and out of a web page on the iPod Touch absolutely negates the argument that 800x480 is superior for web surfing. I can tell you right now, the web browsing experience is actually much better on the iPod Touch than on the N810. The zoom function on the iPod Touch is so good that the one on the N810 may as well not exist for it doesn't even compare. Web pages on the iPod Touch are much more responsive, you can navigate them faster and read them more easily. On the N810 I absolutely hated having to get out the stylus to click a tiny link or button, put the stylus away, then get it out 30 seconds later to do that same thing. The zoom ability combined with the active touch screen on the iPod touch makes this no problem at all. Flash support was another issue that sent me initially toward the N810, however so far, there has not been a time on the iPod Touch where I would require flash. The only time I might would be watching YouTube videos, but with a native YouTube app right on the iPod Touch you are covered. Some people might say "what about flash games?" I can tell you that there are probably very few situations where the N810 has: a) the power to run the game at an acceptable performance, and b) the input required to play that game adequately, thus it may as well not even have flash support.
I was a huge proponent to the hardware keyboard. As a UMPC user, I have always been used to terrible on screen keyboards as a result of a passive touch screen (more on the screen later), the N810's hardware keyboard is actually quite good. With a bit of practice I feel as though I can type just as quickly on the iPod Touch. Part of this is due to a very good auto correction system on the iPod Touch which is very impressive when you see it in action.
Now the screen - for those of you who have never used an active touch (capacitive) touchscreen, it will be hard to convey how much better active touch is for finger input. The way active touch works is that it basically creates an equal electrical field under the screen which is disrupted by your finger. Active touch screens detect the entire surface of your finger, not just one point. This means the software can more accurately understand where you are trying to touch by analyzing the entire touch, not just one single point of input. The the credit of the N810, it is much better than most passive touch screens because it requires a very light touch in order to accept an input, but still significantly more pressure than an active touchscreen.
Lets move on to the most important part - the OS. I'm not sure if the iPod Touch is more powerful or what, but it is much more responsive than the N810 even with all the impressive eye candy the GUI employs. I saw pretty frequent hangs on the N810, applications would pop up over each other which was rather annoying. The iPod Touch's interface is incredibly well polished, which you can expect from Apple; I wish I could say that the N810's interface was at least average, but I truthfully cannot. I still see annoying graphical bugs, and applications often consist of extremely basic buttons and lists. As I mentioned earlier, half of OS2008 seems to be designed for the stylus, and the other half for the finger. If it was one way or the other it would probably be pretty nice, but being 50/50 means a poor experience for the end user.
I hate to say this because I respect all the people who have worked and continue to work on the N810, but a hacked iPod Touch's third party applications tend to work better than first party apps for the N810. Make note of this - I probably wouldn't have bought the iPod Touch if it wasn't hacked to allow third party app support, that is how much the additional apps extend the functionality of the device. Nokia needs to realize how important the software is, and how they need to nail at least the basic apps that people expect from a mobile companion. So far they have failed to do that.
Luckily you have a few great apps like Canola which are quality built, and will be strong players for the future of the N810. If there were more home run apps like Canola, I think the N810 would be much more formidable against something like the iPod Touch, however at this point the N810 doesn't have many great apps backing it, and unfortunately the release of the iPod/iPhone SDK means this gap will only grow wider.
Another thing that should be known is that I was not that impressed with the iPod Touch's battery. I thought that as most electronics OEMs do, Nokia would have padded their 7 hours of battery life on the N810 under average use, but I usually got around 7 hours indeed, the battery on the N810 was really impressive. The iPod Touch on the other hand says it will run for about 5 hours, but I have been getting closer to 4 hours. Keep in mind though, the iPod Touch is generally in my pocket playing music during parts of the day, so that contributes to the seemingly low battery life of the iPod Touch.
One last note I'd like to make is that the N810 is better for multitasking. On the iPod Touch, if you are emailing, you are emailing. If you are browsing the web, you are browsing the web. There isn't much multitasking on the iPod Touch aside from being able to listen to music in nearly every single corner of the device's OS. However, for some of us we would rather run apps one at a time with incredible responsiveness, than multiple low quality apps that don't function well at the same time.
The N810 might be a great mobile device for a developer, but I am not a developer, I'm an end user who pays attention to things like usability and a good UI. The N810 is still on its way to becoming a mainstream consumer device, but I don't think it is there yet.
If you have any questions about the two devices feel free to ask, I'll do my best to answer them.
Edit: Two things I'm missing about the N810 -
A response to a post later in this thread with some potentially useful information -
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Last edited by Benz145; 2008-03-28 at 02:30.