Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1,513 | Thanked: 2,248 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ US
#21
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
OK, you live in a crappy area for Wifi access. I'm sorry to hear that, but what does that have to do with WiMAX? :\
When WiFi access is hit or miss, the IT suffers in comparison to vaguely similar devices that offer 3G cellular access. Since the IT will not have 3G absent a major corporate earthquake (not the routine triannual reorganization), WiMax is (perhaps was) the only hope for IT lovers not wanting to be dependent on WiFi.
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#22
Originally Posted by SD69 View Post
When WiFi access is hit or miss, the IT suffers in comparison to vaguely similar devices that offer 3G cellular access. Since the IT will not have 3G absent a major corporate earthquake (not the routine triannual reorganization), WiMax is (perhaps was) the only hope for IT lovers not wanting to be dependent on WiFi.
You're kidding, right? 3G access works great for me (with fall-back to EDGE when I'm out of 3G coverage areas).
 
Posts: 259 | Thanked: 72 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Halifax, NS
#23
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Canada has one of the best WiMAX deployments available, and it's much, much, much more reasonably priced than normal cellular data plans. WiMAX is the holy grail of data access for Canadians.
Augh! Why did you have to tell me this? I figured WiMAX was another one of those things Canadians had to hear about but not have available or affordable. Now I see there is extensive coverage in my area! Cheap! (Rogers Portable Internet and Sympatico Internet Unplugged $25-$60 per month, depending on bandwidth) Now I need a new gadget. And I was so happy with my existing one.

Well, it seems you have to have their modems for the time being. We'll see if you can get to it from third party devices soon.
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#24
Originally Posted by Benz145 View Post
To my knowledge I don't even think there is any coverage in my area (close to a major city). Its like having cars, but not roads : /
Don't assume your example defines the whole.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Posts: 472 | Thanked: 107 times | Joined on Apr 2007 @ Texas
#25
Personally, I don't see the point, either.

I mean, right now, I pay ONE monthly access fee and can use that data stream on either my N95 or my N810 (tethered to the N95). That's HSDPA, and as was pointed out, falls back to EDGE, which means that for one price I have what's basically a nationwide coverage area.

With WiMax (the same argument could be used against adding a SIM slot to the Tablets) I now have to pay for ANOTHER data access point. I highly doubt that I'll be able to use the same data stream on my cellphone AND my Tablet. Also, I'm now limited to the WiMax carriers (being Sprint and Clearwire, basically), whereas with BT tethering, I could use AT&T for HSDPA, Sprint for EV-DO Rev A, Verizon for EV-DO, or whoever else.
__________________
Maemo-Guru.com for news, reviews, and walkthroughs
 
Mara's Avatar
Posts: 1,310 | Thanked: 820 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Irving, TX
#26
What is more interesting to me, if the WiMax is feasible replacement for my home internet connection? (To do so I'd like to have ~2Mbits/s or better speed... Currently I have 5Mbits/s FiOS, but that is more speedy that I really need...) The benefit I'm looking for is one bill to pay for mobile and home high speed internet access.

This is how it (should?) work: Once at home, I'd have WiMax receiver (or how do you call these units?), and hook that up to Wlan router. That is to connect my home PC computers, SIP-phone, as well as the N8x0 devices.

When on the go, I just turn off (if even needed?) the home WiMax receiver and enable the N810W WiMax radio to "transfer" the service over there. Then I'd have the same high speed internet coverage on the go, and only pay one monthly bill!

Is this possible or just a dream?
 
Posts: 13 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#27
Has anyone here actually used a WiMax service? My Dad used to have Clearwire (Ohio) and it was horrible. I could bluetooth tether my macbook to my sprint moto q and pull up pages faster than he could.

Also, does WiMax handle handoffs, etc? With the 3G network, I can drive home from work (25 miles) and never have a hiccup in my streaming radio
 
IcelandDreams's Avatar
Posts: 228 | Thanked: 30 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ Ontario & Iceland
#28
Originally Posted by rcadden View Post
Personally, I don't see the point, either.
I now have to pay for ANOTHER data access point. I highly doubt that I'll be able to use the same data stream on my cellphone AND my Tablet.
Ahh, but for folks like me I CAN do everything on one line. With WiFI I do everything since I don't have a cell phone and will not get one until prices come down by at least 1/3 or more and then maybe never since my SIP costs almost $0. What this promises is reasonably high speed access that can roam much easier than WiFI. However I doubt I would replace my home internet with this so I'm not yet sold on the idea.

But Rogers/Sympatico/Bell? These are the people that I won't buy *anything* else from so I'm still doubtful about their Max products. I see there is Millennium Data Services in Canada offering WiMAX. Oh, they call it 'pre-WiMAX'. Like so called N-WiFI, I'm not touching it until it is final and more mature. By then the IT lineup will have matured and priced nice.
 
Posts: 472 | Thanked: 107 times | Joined on Apr 2007 @ Texas
#29
Originally Posted by shaunhey View Post
Has anyone here actually used a WiMax service? My Dad used to have Clearwire (Ohio) and it was horrible. I could bluetooth tether my macbook to my sprint moto q and pull up pages faster than he could.

Also, does WiMax handle handoffs, etc? With the 3G network, I can drive home from work (25 miles) and never have a hiccup in my streaming radio
I've actually had quite a bit of experience with Clearwire, both in Abilene, TX for a year and a half (one of their initial launch cities) and more recently, in Waco, TX, to livecast my wedding:

http://www.flixwagon.com/wedding/ over Nokia N82's.


I found the service to be pretty stinkin quick, and having 2 cellphones continually streaming video over it is pretty impressive.
__________________
Maemo-Guru.com for news, reviews, and walkthroughs
 
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#30
Originally Posted by rcadden View Post
Personally, I don't see the point, either.

I mean, right now, I pay ONE monthly access fee and can use that data stream on either my N95 or my N810 (tethered to the N95). That's HSDPA, and as was pointed out, falls back to EDGE, which means that for one price I have what's basically a nationwide coverage area.

With WiMax (the same argument could be used against adding a SIM slot to the Tablets) I now have to pay for ANOTHER data access point. I highly doubt that I'll be able to use the same data stream on my cellphone AND my Tablet. Also, I'm now limited to the WiMax carriers (being Sprint and Clearwire, basically), whereas with BT tethering, I could use AT&T for HSDPA, Sprint for EV-DO Rev A, Verizon for EV-DO, or whoever else.
In fairness, you could always tether your phone to the tablet for the tablet's data connection... that probably is not trivial, though, as I'd bet it's not a use case the phone s/w designers looked at.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:11.