![]() |
2008-07-11
, 01:07
|
|
Posts: 475 |
Thanked: 771 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
|
#12
|
The Following User Says Thank You to fiferboy For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-07-11
, 01:17
|
Posts: 674 |
Thanked: 191 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
#13
|
![]() |
2008-07-11
, 01:23
|
|
Posts: 475 |
Thanked: 771 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
|
#14
|
![]() |
2008-07-11
, 01:42
|
Posts: 674 |
Thanked: 191 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
#15
|
![]() |
2008-07-11
, 07:02
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#16
|
![]() |
2008-07-11
, 07:23
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#17
|
![]() |
2008-07-11
, 09:08
|
Posts: 225 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
|
#18
|
![]() |
2008-07-11
, 11:35
|
|
Posts: 475 |
Thanked: 771 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
|
#19
|
![]() |
2008-07-11
, 15:51
|
Posts: 187 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
|
#20
|
i do wonder if some kind of auto sizing would be better, and some options for direction of stacking or something.
say you set it to stack horizontally, then it will try to fill the number of columns before moving to the next row.
if set for vertical, it will fill the number of rows before moving to the next column.
maybe a option for where the stacking should start to, like top/bottom, left/right.
Last edited by tso; 2008-07-11 at 00:52.