Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#31
I totally reflashed my NIT and started with a new .mozilla profile. Not used any backup. Then I compiled the extensions for Diablo in ScratchBox. Haven't had a problem since then. Yes, sometimes need to double click to get Flash working (Youtube) but 1) I don't watch Youtube a lot 2) Often Flash ads are crowded on webpages. If there is one thing I don't want on my NIT its ads... but I see the point of not wanting to download Flash at all too. I just think flashblock is a more user-friendly way to surf. I'd love to have NoScript on the NIT too, but that'd probably not be user-friendly enough to handle...
 
Underscore's Avatar
Posts: 276 | Thanked: 74 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Missouri, USA
#32
Originally Posted by vinc17 View Post
I installed Flashblock yesterday and I've had the same problem for some Flash objects. And I just have a standard internal boot.

EDIT: this problem has also been seen by tso.

Now I've seen that after restarting the browser, all components I installed have disappeared! EDIT: after renaming the .mozilla directory (to make sure to start from something clean) and rebooting my N810, the components reappeared.
Funnily enough, the Greasemonkey script stopped working, so I decided to go back to Flashblock (same install and same .mozilla profile). Now Flashblock works like a charm o_O.
I guess it 'fixed itself' over time.
 
Posts: 227 | Thanked: 53 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Lyon, France
#33
Originally Posted by Underscore View Post
Now Flashblock works like a charm o_O.
I guess it 'fixed itself' over time.
Could you try on http://www.cio-online.com/videos/lir...tiens-274.html? I had the problem on this URL (and on YouTube too). With this page (which contains 4 Flash objects), the second Flash object appeared below its container and wasn't blocked (this one isn't an ad, but this is a bug anyway). Note that I have no problem with Firefox + Flashblock on my Linux laptop. BTW, I wonder if the Flashblock port for MicroB is too old: it was announced in January while the latest Flashblock version for Firefox was released on May 16.

Also, all the components I installed have disappeared again!

EDIT: I eventually reported a bug: https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3471

Last edited by vinc17; 2008-07-20 at 20:56.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to vinc17 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 12 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Jun 2008
#34
voted your bug

looks like components management in diablo is far from polished
when are we going to have a http://browser-extras.garage.maemo.org/browser-extras/ diablo repository?
this is a INTERNET tablet after all...
 
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#35
I guess they work on fremantle.

Chinook is like a LTS; Diablo a minor upgrade... sigh
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:28.