![]() |
2008-07-20
, 09:16
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#2
|
The Following User Says Thank You to qwerty12 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-07-20
, 09:27
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#3
|
![]() |
2008-07-20
, 09:39
|
Posts: 73 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#4
|
Details: http://www.internettablettalk.com/fo...14&postcount=3
![]() |
2008-07-20
, 09:48
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#5
|
is that means i could remove package 'flash-and-reboot,initfs-flasher and kernel-diablo-flasher', without any problem?
![]() |
2008-07-20
, 10:08
|
Posts: 73 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#6
|
Please read the linked post completely (and search before you post new threads . . .).
What it means is that it's a minor glitch in the SSU implementation, running apt-get -f install will fix it.
![]() |
2008-07-20
, 10:22
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#7
|
apt-get install wget flash-and-reboot initfs-flasher kernel-diablo-flasher,
seem everything ok now. installation succeed.
my question is, is there any problem and why does the wget depend on package "flash-and-reboot initfs-flasher kernel-diablo-flasher" ?