Gorgon
|
2008-08-08
, 10:56
|
|
Posts: 99 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Philadelphia, PA
|
#11
|
|
2008-08-08
, 13:27
|
Posts: 234 |
Thanked: 40 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Cincinnati, Ohio USA
|
#13
|
|
2008-08-08
, 14:41
|
Posts: 204 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
@ Berlin, Germany
|
#14
|
Where I personally work and live, there are life support machines nearby that are...rather sensitive to GPS-using devices. This is part of the reason there are legally no phones allowed to be activated within something a little under 1/4 mile distance from this location. ...
|
2008-08-09
, 03:48
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
|
#15
|
As to how it can happen, only the simplest radios can operate with just a passive tuner; anything like GPS has to generate a reference frequency, and some portion of that will be emitted.
As for the 400-yard limit, it seems excessive to me, but I suppose I don't have any data on the equipment in question
Seriously, if there is a concern of a leaky LO in a GPS chipset, then there should be a concern with any computer/electrical device. I'm pretty sure that the computer/tablet clock frequency or some harmonic thereof is likely radiating as well.
Do you mean GSM instead of GPS? Usually GSM radio is not allowed within certain distances around sensitive devices. It is almost impossible for a GPS device to disturb such electronic devices.
|
2008-08-09
, 05:35
|
|
Posts: 129 |
Thanked: 81 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Austin, TX
|
#16
|
Though I will be honest, my direct preference is being able to open the n810, remove the GPS and, if and/or when the time requires it, be able to put it back in.
|
2008-08-09
, 05:54
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#17
|
|
2008-08-09
, 05:56
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
|
#18
|